libcurl 的连接缓存匹配函数从未考虑自动客户端证书选项,因此,一个已通过认证的 Schannel 连接(来自缓存)可能会被传递给一个被重定向到不同源站点的传输任务,即使代码已明确为该传输任务关闭了自动客户端证书选项,以防止此类情况发生。
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-92391 | curl_mime_free stack overflow by recursion | |
| CVE-2026-107928 | info leak uploading over WebSockets with GnuTLS | |
| CVE-2026-107929 | local interface connection reuse mixup | |
| CVE-2026-94266 | password leak in CURLINFO_EFFECTIVE_URL | |
| CVE-2026-94265 | Authorization: Negotiate sent to foreign origin | |
| CVE-2026-86414 | leaking host credentials to HTTP proxy | |
| CVE-2026-92390 | -J no-clobber guarantee bypassed with 103 early hints | |
| CVE-2026-92387 | never-ending loop via server response omission | |
| CVE-2026-92388 | FTP wildcard write callback mixup | |
| CVE-2026-92386 | server-set cookie aborts cookie jar load | |
| CVE-2026-92389 | TFTP direction confusion | |
| CVE-2026-86409 | stale SigV4 headers sent unintended | |
| CVE-2026-87865 | knownhost callback mismatches key as missing | |
| CVE-2026-87864 | IMAP APPEND plus CRLF conversion command injection | |
| CVE-2026-87863 | HSTS response erases persisted entries | |
| CVE-2026-87866 | wolfSSL public-key pinning bypass | |
| CVE-2026-87861 | cross-origin reuse of a Negotiate connection | |
| CVE-2026-87862 | HSTS cache import drops longer-lived child | |
| CVE-2026-86411 | FTP connection reuse inherits client-certificate | |
| CVE-2026-86412 | server-set cookie erases cookie jar |
Showing top 20 of 23 CVEs. View all on vendor page → →