如果在较长的子域名 HSTS 条目之前导入一个带有 属性的父级 HSTS 条目,该子条目会被静默丢弃。因此,当父级条目过期时,原本有效的子域名 HSTS 策略将随之丢失,导致 curl 发出未加密的 HTTP 请求,而非将其升级为 HTTPS。
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-92389 | TFTP direction confusion | |
| CVE-2026-107928 | info leak uploading over WebSockets with GnuTLS | |
| CVE-2026-107929 | local interface connection reuse mixup | |
| CVE-2026-94266 | password leak in CURLINFO_EFFECTIVE_URL | |
| CVE-2026-94265 | Authorization: Negotiate sent to foreign origin | |
| CVE-2026-86415 | auto client cert connection reuse mixup | |
| CVE-2026-86414 | leaking host credentials to HTTP proxy | |
| CVE-2026-92390 | -J no-clobber guarantee bypassed with 103 early hints | |
| CVE-2026-92387 | never-ending loop via server response omission | |
| CVE-2026-92388 | FTP wildcard write callback mixup | |
| CVE-2026-92386 | server-set cookie aborts cookie jar load | |
| CVE-2026-86409 | stale SigV4 headers sent unintended | |
| CVE-2026-92391 | curl_mime_free stack overflow by recursion | |
| CVE-2026-87865 | knownhost callback mismatches key as missing | |
| CVE-2026-87864 | IMAP APPEND plus CRLF conversion command injection | |
| CVE-2026-87863 | HSTS response erases persisted entries | |
| CVE-2026-87866 | wolfSSL public-key pinning bypass | |
| CVE-2026-87861 | cross-origin reuse of a Negotiate connection | |
| CVE-2026-86411 | FTP connection reuse inherits client-certificate | |
| CVE-2026-86412 | server-set cookie erases cookie jar |
Showing top 20 of 23 CVEs. View all on vendor page → →