Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CVE-2026-89815— drm/ttm: Drop tt->restore after successful restore

Quick assessment

Affected
Linux Linux
Exploitation
No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation; assess based on exposure
Recommended action
Check the vendor advisory and references for a fixed version. If immediate upgrade is impossible, restrict exposure and increase monitoring.

在 Linux 内核中,已解决以下漏洞: drm/ttm:在恢复成功后丢弃 tt->restore 能够通过 成功完成恢复过程,但在之后并未清除(drop) 指针。这导致后续的备份/恢复流程观察到的是一个“看似已完成”的恢复状态,而实际上 中仍然安装着 shmem 句柄,从而导致了下方所示的调用栈跟踪。 修复方法:在 中,当恢复成功完成后,释放并清除 。 以下是崩溃时的内核调用栈跟踪信息:

CVSS 7.8 · High EPSS 0.17% · P6

Possible ATT&CK Techniques 1 AI

T1190 · Exploit Public-Facing Application

Affected Version Matrix 8

VendorProduct Version RangeStatus
Linux Linux b63d715b8090aed48bdef5930625946fa4c0d324< 329ddc5d438f991f49e4fd24c704d1c7288d5e03 affected
b63d715b8090aed48bdef5930625946fa4c0d324< a46ab76b6cf5478e2ac7b942a377c7a1827b436a affected
b63d715b8090aed48bdef5930625946fa4c0d324< 941ac10529b3be5965a88d432a161ab459672ba8 affected
6.15 affected
< 6.15 unaffected
6.18.53≤ 6.18.* unaffected
7.2.5≤ 7.2.* unaffected
7.3-rc1≤ * unaffected
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilities Log in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2026-89815

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
drm/ttm: Drop tt->restore after successful restore
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/ttm: Drop tt->restore after successful restore ttm_pool_restore_and_alloc() can successfully complete the restore process via ttm_pool_restore_commit(), but tt->restore is not dropped afterward. As a result, subsequent backup/restore flows observe what appears to be a completed restore, while in reality shmem handles are still installed in tt->pages, leading to the stack trace below. Fix this by freeing and dropping tt->restore in ttm_pool_restore_and_alloc() upon successful completion of the restore. 20545 [  309.784531] RIP: 0010:sg_alloc_append_table_from_pages+0x38c/0x490 20547 [  309.809570] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000623b838 EFLAGS: 00010206 20548 [  309.814827] RAX: 0000000000001000 RBX: ffff88816e42a160 RCX: 0000000000000000 20549 [  309.821986] RDX: 0000000000002000 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI: 0000000000001000 20550 [  309.829147] RBP: ffff88816e42a168 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 000000007ffff000 20551 [  309.836310] R10: ffffc9000623b928 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 000000007ffff000 20552 [  309.843471] R13: ffff88815ba5a100 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 20553 [  309.850634] FS:  00007f9ff305e700(0000) GS:ffff888276c94000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 20554 [  309.858749] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 20555 [  309.864519] CR2: 00007f9fca701000 CR3: 00000001565e2005 CR4: 0000000008f70ef0 20556 [  309.871678] PKRU: 55555558 20557 [  309.874403] Call Trace: 20558 [  309.876866]  <TASK> 20559 [  309.878988]  sg_alloc_table_from_pages_segment+0x60/0x100 20560 [  309.884415]  ? ttm_resource_manager_usage+0x36/0x60 [ttm] 20561 [  309.889845]  ? xe_tt_map_sg+0x7d/0xd0 [xe] 20562 [  309.894045]  xe_tt_map_sg+0x7d/0xd0 [xe] 20563 [  309.898037]  xe_bo_move+0x927/0xaa0 [xe] 20564 [  309.902029]  ttm_bo_handle_move_mem+0xba/0x170 [ttm] 20565 [  309.907022]  ttm_bo_validate+0xbe/0x190 [ttm] 20566 [  309.911405]  xe_bo_validate+0x9a/0x120 [xe] 20567 [  309.915663]  xe_gpuvm_validate+0xd9/0x140 [xe] 20568 [  309.920206]  drm_gpuvm_validate+0x2f0/0x5b0 [drm_gpuvm] 20569 [  309.925459]  ? drm_exec_lock_obj+0x63/0x210 [drm_exec] 20570 [  309.930627]  xe_vm_validate_rebind+0x46/0xb0 [xe] 20571 [  309.935428]  xe_exec_fn+0x20/0x40 [xe] 20572 [  309.939249]  drm_gpuvm_exec_lock+0x78/0xc0 [drm_gpuvm] 20573 [  309.944410]  xe_validation_exec_lock+0x5a/0xa0 [xe] 20574 [  309.949385]  xe_exec_ioctl+0x806/0xc30 [xe] 20575 [  309.953639]  ? ttwu_queue_wakelist+0xd9/0xf0 20576 [  309.957935]  ? __pfx_xe_exec_fn+0x10/0x10 [xe] 20577 [  309.962449]  ? __wake_up_common+0x73/0xa0 20578 [  309.966482]  ? __pfx_xe_exec_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [xe] 20579 [  309.971263]  drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa3/0x100 20580 [  309.975209]  drm_ioctl+0x213/0x440 20581 [  309.978637]  ? __pfx_xe_exec_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [xe] 20582 [  309.983415]  xe_drm_ioctl+0x67/0xd0 [xe] 20583 [  309.987408]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x7f/0xd0
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5

Affected Products

Vendor Product Affected Versions CPE Subscribe
Linux Linux b63d715b8090aed48bdef5930625946fa4c0d324 ~ 329ddc5d438f991f49e4fd24c704d1c7288d5e03 -
Linux Linux 6.15 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2026-89815

# POC Description Source Link Shenlong Link
AI-Generated POC Premium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2026-89815

请登录查看更多情报信息。

Other References for CVE-2026-89815 (3)

Same Patch Batch · Linux · 2026-09-16 · 276 CVEs total

CVE-2026-90048 9.8 CRITICAL fs/ntfs3: fix slab-out-of-bounds write in ni_create_attr_list()
CVE-2026-90012 9.8 CRITICAL spi: Fix DMA mapping ownership on partial map failure
CVE-2026-89970 9.8 CRITICAL nvmet-auth: Synchronize timeout work during SQ teardown
CVE-2026-89857 9.8 CRITICAL scsi: qla2xxx: Hold qpair lock when sending NVMe LS reject
CVE-2026-89969 9.8 CRITICAL nvmet-tcp: fix out-of-bounds write when receiving an over-long PDU
CVE-2026-89847 9.8 CRITICAL scsi: qla2xxx: Avoid double completion in async IOCB timeout
CVE-2026-89972 9.8 CRITICAL nvme: add missing SRCU grace period in error path
CVE-2026-89990 9.8 CRITICAL ceph: lock mutex in ceph_mds_check_access()
CVE-2026-90036 9.8 CRITICAL NFSD: Prevent client use-after-free during blocked-lock reaping
CVE-2026-90038 9.8 CRITICAL NFSD: Prevent client use-after-free during export state revocation
CVE-2026-90037 9.8 CRITICAL NFSD: Prevent client use-after-free during close_lru reaping
CVE-2026-89788 9.8 CRITICAL ksmbd: fix tree connection use-after-free in smb2_tree_connect()
CVE-2026-89783 9.8 CRITICAL xfrm6: fix out-of-bounds write in xfrm6_input_addr() when secpath is full
CVE-2026-90042 9.8 CRITICAL ceph: properly decrypt filenames in vmalloc() buffers
CVE-2026-89778 9.8 CRITICAL isofs: fix out-of-bounds page array access on empty zisofs block
CVE-2026-89915 9.3 CRITICAL KVM: arm64: Remove VM-wide VNCR mapping counter
CVE-2026-90049 9.3 CRITICAL net: skbuff: don't skb_tx_error() the source skb in skb_zerocopy()
CVE-2026-89775 9.3 CRITICAL KVM: arm64: Handle negative S1 walk levels in VNCR TLB size evaluation
CVE-2026-89916 9.3 CRITICAL KVM: arm64: Make VNCR invalidation participate in MMU invalidation retry
CVE-2026-89930 9.3 CRITICAL KVM: nVMX: Service local TLB flushes on failed nested VM-Enter

Showing top 20 of 276 CVEs. View all on vendor page &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-89815

No comments yet


Leave a comment