Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%
Buy Us a Coffee

CVE-2026-90265— btrfs: defrag: fix deadlock between defrag and delalloc space reservation

Quick assessment

Affected
Linux Linux
Exploitation
No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation; assess based on exposure
Recommended action
Check the vendor advisory and references for a fixed version. If immediate upgrade is impossible, restrict exposure and increase monitoring.

在 Linux 内核中，已修复以下漏洞： btrfs: defrag: 修复 defrag 与 delalloc 空间预留之间的死锁 在同时启用 和 并运行 时，发生了死锁。其原因是：在执行碎片整理（defrag）时，btrfs 在持有“脏页和已锁定页（folio）”以及“extent 范围锁”的同时，又尝试预留 delalloc（延迟分配）空间。由于这些资源被同时持有，导致不同线程相互等待，形成死锁。 以下是相关的内核调用栈跟踪信息： 1. 任务 （异步回收元数据空间的工作线程） - 该线程执行 ，在 中阻塞，等

AI Predicted 7.0 Difficulty: Moderate EPSS 0.21% · P10

Possible ATT&CK Techniques 1 AI

T1557 · Adversary-in-the-Middle

Affected Version Matrix 8

VendorProduct Version RangeStatus
Linux Linux 22b398eeeed43d51e85b1008e51bf9663ac1f491< a9701dd06e82c345fe70debdf8835b7eb5000c59 affected
22b398eeeed43d51e85b1008e51bf9663ac1f491< ac916391e1c70801649f7d6f85014f687983bc33 affected
22b398eeeed43d51e85b1008e51bf9663ac1f491< ba02eab28041f9a4bbe9fc90c7249644fef6de0f affected
5.16 affected
< 5.16 unaffected
6.18.52≤ 6.18.* unaffected
7.2.6≤ 7.2.* unaffected
7.3-rc1≤ * unaffected
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilities Log in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2026-90265

Vulnerability Information
Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
btrfs: defrag: fix deadlock between defrag and delalloc space reservation
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: defrag: fix deadlock between defrag and delalloc space reservation While running fsstress with autodefrag and flushoncommit, hit a deadlock due to the fact that defrag reserves delalloc space while it's holding dirty and locked folios, besides the extent range lock. The stack traces are the following: [958.624] task:kworker/u50:3 state:D stack:0 pid:20365 tgid:20365 ppid:2 task_flags:0x4208060 flags:0x00080000 [958.626] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space [btrfs] [958.627] Call Trace: [958.628] <TASK> [958.628] __schedule+0x4be/0x10f0 [958.629] ? preempt_count_add+0x69/0xa0 [958.630] schedule+0x26/0xd0 [958.631] wait_current_trans+0x102/0x160 [btrfs] [958.632] ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10 [958.633] start_transaction+0x374/0x900 [btrfs] [958.634] btrfs_commit_current_transaction+0x1d/0x70 [btrfs] [958.635] flush_space+0xca/0x5e0 [btrfs] [958.636] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x15/0x30 [958.637] ? btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile+0x8c/0x190 [btrfs] [958.639] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x15/0x30 [958.640] ? calc_available_free_space.isra.0+0x6f/0x110 [btrfs] [958.641] do_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x84/0x190 [btrfs] [958.642] btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x64/0x80 [btrfs] [958.644] process_one_work+0x19d/0x3a0 [958.644] worker_thread+0x1c4/0x330 [958.645] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [958.646] kthread+0xfc/0x130 [958.647] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [958.648] ret_from_fork+0x1f7/0x2c0 [958.648] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [958.649] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [958.650] </TASK> [958.651] task:kworker/u49:7 state:D stack:0 pid:52990 tgid:52990 ppid:2 task_flags:0x4208060 flags:0x00080000 [958.653] Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-btrfs-334) [958.655] Call Trace: [958.655] <TASK> [958.656] __schedule+0x4be/0x10f0 [958.657] ? __blk_flush_plug+0xe9/0x140 [958.658] schedule+0x26/0xd0 [958.658] io_schedule+0x42/0x70 [958.659] folio_wait_bit_common+0x12b/0x330 [958.660] ? folio_wait_bit_common+0x100/0x330 [958.662] ? __pfx_wake_page_function+0x10/0x10 [958.663] extent_write_cache_pages+0x599/0x830 [btrfs] [958.664] ? acpi_fwnode_get_reference_args+0x1fa/0x270 [958.665] btrfs_writepages+0x77/0x130 [btrfs] [958.666] ? __pfx_end_bbio_data_write+0x10/0x10 [btrfs] [958.667] do_writepages+0xc6/0x160 [958.668] __writeback_single_inode+0x42/0x310 [958.669] writeback_sb_inodes+0x231/0x570 [958.670] wb_writeback+0x8a/0x340 [958.671] wb_workfn+0xbf/0x450 [958.672] ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xc1/0x350 [958.673] process_one_work+0x19d/0x3a0 [958.673] worker_thread+0x1c4/0x330 [958.674] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [958.675] kthread+0xfc/0x130 [958.676] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [958.676] ret_from_fork+0x1f7/0x2c0 [958.677] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [958.678] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [958.679] </TASK> [958.679] task:btrfs-cleaner state:D stack:0 pid:296750 tgid:296750 ppid:2 task_flags:0x208040 flags:0x00080000 [958.681] Call Trace: [958.682] <TASK> [958.682] __schedule+0x4be/0x10f0 [958.683] schedule+0x26/0xd0 [958.684] handle_reserve_ticket+0x1b9/0x2c0 [btrfs] [958.685] ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10 [958.686] reserve_bytes+0x283/0x4c0 [btrfs] [958.687] btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes+0x18/0xb0 [btrfs] [958.688] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata+0x121/0x320 [btrfs] [958.690] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x46/0xb0 [btrfs] [958.691] btrfs_defrag_file+0x903/0x1110 [btrfs] [958.692] btrfs_run_defrag_inodes+0x334/0x430 [btrfs] [958.694] cleaner_kthread+0x97/0x1c0 [btrfs] [958.694] ? __pfx_cleaner_kthread+0x10/0x10 [btrfs] [958.696] kthread+0xfc/0x130 [958.696] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [958.697] ret_ ---truncated---
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5

Affected Products

Vendor Product Affected Versions CPE Subscribe
Linux Linux 22b398eeeed43d51e85b1008e51bf9663ac1f491 ~ a9701dd06e82c345fe70debdf8835b7eb5000c59 -
Linux Linux 5.16 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2026-90265

# POC Description Source Link Shenlong Link
AI-Generated POC Premium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2026-90265

请登录查看更多情报信息。

Patches & Fixes for CVE-2026-90265 (3)

Same Patch Batch · Linux · 2026-09-17 · 600 CVEs total

CVE-2026-92489 9.8 CRITICAL xfrm: Fix skb double-free in xfrm_dev_direct_output()
CVE-2026-90104 9.8 CRITICAL NFSv4.1: zero referring call lists before decoding
CVE-2026-90235 9.8 CRITICAL sunrpc: xprtsock: annotate shared socket callbacks with READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE
CVE-2026-90173 9.8 CRITICAL smb: smbdirect: free completion queues with ib_free_cq()
CVE-2026-90151 9.8 CRITICAL NFSv4: remove callback IDR entry on client allocation failure
CVE-2026-90110 9.4 CRITICAL inetpeer: randomize RB-tree node comparison using SipHash
CVE-2026-90413 9.1 CRITICAL IB/isert: reject login PDUs declaring more data than was received
CVE-2026-90414 9.1 CRITICAL IB/isert: reject PDUs declaring more data than was received
CVE-2026-90230 9.1 CRITICAL nvmet: fix heap out-of-bounds read in nvmet_auth_negotiate()
CVE-2026-90256 8.8 HIGH Bluetooth: L2CAP: use proto_lock for l2cap_data to fix l2cap_disconn_ind
CVE-2026-90357 8.8 HIGH wifi: mt76: mt7915: unlink TWT flow if the MCU rejects the agreement
CVE-2026-90286 8.8 HIGH drm/amdgpu/gfx6: Use PFP on the compute queues too
CVE-2026-90381 8.8 HIGH wifi: mt76: fix handling channel context with different bands in mt76_switch_vif_chanctx()
CVE-2026-90380 8.8 HIGH wifi: mt76: mt792x: fix use-after-free in mt76_rx_poll_complete
CVE-2026-90329 8.8 HIGH HID: synchronize input before cleaning up a failed probe
CVE-2026-93042 8.8 HIGH dmaengine: dw-edma: Terminate all descriptors without callbacks
CVE-2026-90162 8.8 HIGH ksmbd: defer publishing granted locks to prevent UAF/double-free race
CVE-2026-90379 8.8 HIGH wifi: mt76: mt7921: Add PCIe AER handler support to prevent system crash
CVE-2026-90367 8.8 HIGH wifi: mt76: mt7996: hold dev->mt76.mutex while disabling tx worker in SER
CVE-2026-90371 8.8 HIGH wifi: mt76: fix RXDMAD_C buffer recycling race

Showing top 20 of 600 CVEs. View all on vendor page &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

Same product: Linux
Same vendor: Linux

V. Comments for CVE-2026-90265

No comments yet

Leave a comment