libcurl 的 TFTP 状态机未能根据请求的传输方向验证状态转换,导致其将用于读取和写入的服务器响应(即“打开服务器”响应)混为一谈地接受。恶意 TFTP 服务器可以针对下载请求作出响应,迫使客户端进入发送模式,从而诱导 libcurl 从句柄的持久化 指针中读取并发送数据——其中包括来自无关先前操作(例如在复用句柄上执行的 HTTP POST 请求)的残留数据。
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-92391 | curl_mime_free stack overflow by recursion | |
| CVE-2026-107928 | info leak uploading over WebSockets with GnuTLS | |
| CVE-2026-107929 | local interface connection reuse mixup | |
| CVE-2026-94266 | password leak in CURLINFO_EFFECTIVE_URL | |
| CVE-2026-94265 | Authorization: Negotiate sent to foreign origin | |
| CVE-2026-86415 | auto client cert connection reuse mixup | |
| CVE-2026-86414 | leaking host credentials to HTTP proxy | |
| CVE-2026-92390 | -J no-clobber guarantee bypassed with 103 early hints | |
| CVE-2026-92387 | never-ending loop via server response omission | |
| CVE-2026-92388 | FTP wildcard write callback mixup | |
| CVE-2026-92386 | server-set cookie aborts cookie jar load | |
| CVE-2026-86409 | stale SigV4 headers sent unintended | |
| CVE-2026-87865 | knownhost callback mismatches key as missing | |
| CVE-2026-87864 | IMAP APPEND plus CRLF conversion command injection | |
| CVE-2026-87863 | HSTS response erases persisted entries | |
| CVE-2026-87866 | wolfSSL public-key pinning bypass | |
| CVE-2026-87861 | cross-origin reuse of a Negotiate connection | |
| CVE-2026-87862 | HSTS cache import drops longer-lived child | |
| CVE-2026-86411 | FTP connection reuse inherits client-certificate | |
| CVE-2026-86412 | server-set cookie erases cookie jar |
Showing top 20 of 23 CVEs. View all on vendor page → →