当使用 ( )选项调用 curl 时,若中间出现 103 Early Hints 响应先于最终 HTTP 响应,或在 模式下 头在 头之前被处理,curl 将未能保持其文档中声明的防覆盖保护机制。此缺陷使得 HTTP(S) 服务器能够无视 选项所设定的非覆盖约束,通过 头中的文件名覆盖本地已存在的文件。
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-92391 | curl_mime_free stack overflow by recursion | |
| CVE-2026-107928 | info leak uploading over WebSockets with GnuTLS | |
| CVE-2026-107929 | local interface connection reuse mixup | |
| CVE-2026-94266 | password leak in CURLINFO_EFFECTIVE_URL | |
| CVE-2026-94265 | Authorization: Negotiate sent to foreign origin | |
| CVE-2026-86415 | auto client cert connection reuse mixup | |
| CVE-2026-86414 | leaking host credentials to HTTP proxy | |
| CVE-2026-92387 | never-ending loop via server response omission | |
| CVE-2026-92388 | FTP wildcard write callback mixup | |
| CVE-2026-92386 | server-set cookie aborts cookie jar load | |
| CVE-2026-92389 | TFTP direction confusion | |
| CVE-2026-86409 | stale SigV4 headers sent unintended | |
| CVE-2026-87865 | knownhost callback mismatches key as missing | |
| CVE-2026-87864 | IMAP APPEND plus CRLF conversion command injection | |
| CVE-2026-87863 | HSTS response erases persisted entries | |
| CVE-2026-87866 | wolfSSL public-key pinning bypass | |
| CVE-2026-87861 | cross-origin reuse of a Negotiate connection | |
| CVE-2026-87862 | HSTS cache import drops longer-lived child | |
| CVE-2026-86411 | FTP connection reuse inherits client-certificate | |
| CVE-2026-86412 | server-set cookie erases cookie jar |
Showing top 20 of 23 CVEs. View all on vendor page → →