Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CVE-2026-93228— svcrdma: Reject Write/Reply chunks with segcount 0

Quick assessment

Affected
Linux Linux
Exploitation
No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation; assess based on exposure
Recommended action
Check the vendor advisory and references for a fixed version. If immediate upgrade is impossible, restrict exposure and increase monitoring.

在 Linux 内核中,已解决以下漏洞: svcrdma:拒绝 segcount 为 0 的 Write/Reply 数据块 对等方可以发送一个 字段为零的 Write 或 Reply 数据块。 仅拒绝 的情况,因此零值会通过范围检查,而 会返回当前(非 NULL)光标,且不进行推进。该函数返回 true,随后 将一个 的 链接到 或 。 本系列中的一个较早补丁已使 对 安全,因此它不再驱动以往用于内存遍历的逻辑。在解码边界处拒绝格式错误的帧仍具有价值,作为纵深防御措施:它将退化的零段数据块完全排除在已解析的数据块

CVSS 9.1 · Critical EPSS 0.47% · P38

Affected Version Matrix 10

VendorProduct Version RangeStatus
Linux Linux 78147ca8b4a9b6cf0e597ddd6bf17959e08376c2< fe533ae1bed2ef2b3d54ee7ab410da1874ed3d4f affected
78147ca8b4a9b6cf0e597ddd6bf17959e08376c2< a798714b58041e88716db3bf8fb03ae13eecd54a affected
78147ca8b4a9b6cf0e597ddd6bf17959e08376c2< 45dbdb2637b7fc5f1355b588780d2a7fb0516805 affected
78147ca8b4a9b6cf0e597ddd6bf17959e08376c2< 9808eb7656666acc7291bae9ab6b987bd16e47e0 affected
5.11 affected
< 5.11 unaffected
6.12.111≤ 6.12.* unaffected
6.18.50≤ 6.18.* unaffected
… +2 more rows
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilities Log in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2026-93228

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
svcrdma: Reject Write/Reply chunks with segcount 0
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: svcrdma: Reject Write/Reply chunks with segcount 0 A peer can send a Write or Reply chunk whose segcount field is zero. xdr_check_write_chunk() only rejects segcount > rc_maxpages, so zero passes the range check, and xdr_inline_decode(stream, 0) returns the current (non-NULL) cursor without advancing. The function returns true and pcl_alloc_write() then links a struct svc_rdma_chunk with ch_segcount == 0 onto rc_write_pcl or rc_reply_pcl. An earlier patch in this series made pcl_for_each_segment() safe for ch_segcount == 0, so this no longer drives the memory walk it used to. Rejecting the malformed frame at the decode boundary is still worthwhile as defense in depth: it keeps degenerate zero-segment chunks off the parsed chunk lists entirely, so any future consumer that walks ch_segments directly cannot observe one, and it makes the zero-floor easy to backport to trees where the macro change is more intrusive. RFC 8166 has no meaning for a Write/Reply chunk that describes no remote buffer, so no legitimate client is affected. xdr_check_reply_chunk() funnels Reply chunks through xdr_check_write_chunk() and inherits the same rejection. pcl_alloc_write() also links each chunk onto the parsed chunk list before filling its segment array. If a future change weakens the segcount-0 rejection, an incomplete chunk is visible to consumers during the fill loop. Reorder so that list_add_tail() follows the segment fill loop, ensuring only fully-populated chunks appear on the list.
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5

Affected Products

Vendor Product Affected Versions CPE Subscribe
Linux Linux 78147ca8b4a9b6cf0e597ddd6bf17959e08376c2 ~ fe533ae1bed2ef2b3d54ee7ab410da1874ed3d4f -
Linux Linux 5.11 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2026-93228

# POC Description Source Link Shenlong Link
AI-Generated POC Premium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2026-93228

请登录查看更多情报信息。

Patches & Fixes for CVE-2026-93228 (4)

Same Patch Batch · Linux · 2026-09-24 · 234 CVEs total

CVE-2026-93207 9.8 CRITICAL SUNRPC: Zero rpc_gss_wire_cred at svcauth_gss_decode_credbody() entry
CVE-2026-97413 9.8 CRITICAL RDMA/rtrs-srv: Fix integer underflow in process_read and process_write
CVE-2026-93793 8.8 HIGH wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: validate TX_CMD response layout
CVE-2026-93799 8.8 HIGH wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: validate sta_id in BA window status notif
CVE-2026-93790 8.8 HIGH wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: fix out-of-bounds tid_data access in BA notif
CVE-2026-93806 8.8 HIGH wifi: cfg80211: validate assoc response length before status and IE access
CVE-2026-97442 8.8 HIGH wifi: ath11k: fix invalid data access in ath11k_dp_rx_h_undecap_nwifi
CVE-2026-97409 8.8 HIGH nvme-fc: Do not cancel requests in io target before it is initialized
CVE-2026-97509 8.8 HIGH thunderbolt: Keep XDomain reference during the lifetime of a service
CVE-2026-93280 8.8 HIGH greybus: audio: bound the topology section sizes against the fetched size
CVE-2026-93284 8.8 HIGH drm/pagemap: dma-unmap pages before handling migration errors
CVE-2026-97451 8.4 HIGH ACPICA: Fix integer overflow in acpi_ex_opcode_3A_1T_1R() (mid_op)
CVE-2026-97455 8.4 HIGH ACPICA: Fix use-after-free in acpi_ds_terminate_control_method()
CVE-2026-97452 8.4 HIGH ACPICA: Prevent adding invalid references
CVE-2026-97450 8.4 HIGH ACPICA: validate handler object type in two places
CVE-2026-93827 8.4 HIGH virtio-fs: avoid double-free on failed queue setup
CVE-2026-97433 8.2 HIGH nvme: validate FDP configuration descriptor sizes
CVE-2026-93786 8.1 HIGH ksmbd: preserve VFS inherited POSIX ACL mask
CVE-2026-93221 8.1 HIGH nfsd: convert nfsd_net boolean flags to unsigned long flags word
CVE-2026-93224 8.1 HIGH svcrdma: Fix unmatched rn_unregister on failed accept

Showing top 20 of 234 CVEs. View all on vendor page &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-93228

No comments yet


Leave a comment