Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CVE-2026-96400— Gitea migration SSRF to reserved addresses through ALLOWED_DOMAINS

Quick assessment

Affected
Gitea Gitea
Exploitation
No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation; assess based on exposure
Recommended action
Check the vendor advisory and references for a fixed version. If immediate upgrade is impossible, restrict exposure and increase monitoring.

当 配置项设置为匹配项(例如 或主机名通配符)时,Gitea 的迁移 URL 验证可能会允许保留地址和链路本地地址(例如 ),即使 (禁止访问本地网络)也未生效。原因是本地网络黑名单未涵盖这些地址范围,并且只要主机名匹配允许列表,无论其解析后的实际 IP 地址如何,都会被接受。因此,具备在该实例上启动迁移任务权限的用户,能够从 Gitea 服务器访问这些受保护的地址。注意:默认情况下 为空,此漏洞不影响默认配置。

AI Predicted 7.5 Difficulty: Moderate

Affected Version Matrix 1

VendorProduct Version RangeStatus
Gitea Gitea ≤ 1.27.3 affected
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilities Log in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2026-96400

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
Gitea migration SSRF to reserved addresses through ALLOWED_DOMAINS
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
With `[migrations] ALLOWED_DOMAINS` set to a matching entry such as `*` or a hostname wildcard, Gitea's migration URL validation could permit reserved and link-local addresses, such as `169.254.169.254`, even when `ALLOW_LOCALNETWORKS = false`. The local-network block list did not cover these ranges, and a hostname matching the allow list was accepted regardless of its resolved address. A user who can start migrations on such an instance could reach these addresses from the Gitea server; the default empty `ALLOWED_DOMAINS` configuration is not affected.
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
服务端请求伪造(SSRF)
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5

Affected Products

Vendor Product Affected Versions CPE Subscribe
Gitea Gitea 0 ~ 1.27.3 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2026-96400

# POC Description Source Link Shenlong Link
AI-Generated POC Premium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2026-96400

请登录查看更多情报信息。

Other References for CVE-2026-96400 (4)

Same Patch Batch · Gitea · 2026-10-06 · 21 CVEs total

CVE-2026-104636 Gitea SSRF through Git HTTP redirects in mirrors and fetches
CVE-2026-73278 Gitea WebAuthn bypass during OAuth and OIDC sign-in
CVE-2026-79960 Gitea deploy key pushes acting as the repository owner
CVE-2026-70357 Gitea repository migration SSRF through DNS rebinding
CVE-2026-96580 Gitea Actions memory exhaustion through large static matrices
CVE-2026-96589 Gitea private repository access retained after rejected transfer
CVE-2026-96399 Gitea denial of service through external issue tracker patterns
CVE-2026-96404 Gitea installer authentication bypass for existing accounts
CVE-2026-104626 Gitea fork workflow job revival through later approval
CVE-2026-104632 Gitea fork workflow approval bypass through cancel and rerun
CVE-2026-94205 Gitea fork workflow approval bypass through maintainer-triggered events
CVE-2026-101027 Gitea migration SSRF through ALLOWED_DOMAINS address check bypass
CVE-2026-101029 Gitea migration and pull mirror SSRF through multi-answer DNS
CVE-2026-95106 Gitea review and execution mismatch through duplicate tree entries
CVE-2026-95112 Gitea issue reference parsing CPU exhaustion
CVE-2026-89430 Gitea push mirror SSRF and forced writes to internal Git hosts
CVE-2026-103504 Gitea API team demotion not applied to unit permissions
CVE-2026-103667 Gitea container registry stored XSS through blob media type
CVE-2026-103059 Gitea built-in SSH server authentication bypass through key case folding
CVE-2026-103670 Gitea trusted workflow cancellation by unapproved fork runs

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-96400

No comments yet


Leave a comment