Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CVE-2026-98256— signal: Prevent exec() race

Quick assessment

Affected
Linux Linux
Exploitation
No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation; assess based on exposure
Recommended action
Check the vendor advisory and references for a fixed version. If immediate upgrade is impossible, restrict exposure and increase monitoring.

在 Linux 内核中,以下漏洞已得到修复: 信号处理:防止 exec() 竞争条件 Hyunwoo 调试了以下 KASAN(内核地址 sanitization)使用后释放(UAF)崩溃信息: 事实证明,正如 Hyunwoo 所解释的,这种情况发生在非领导者线程执行 时: 在 之前调用 ,因此由针对领导者线程 ID(tid)创建的 定时器持有的 现在指向调用 的线程。 返回该线程,且在其上调用 成功。 如果定时器信号被阻塞,其 会保留在领导者进程的 (待处理信号队列)中。该定时器的下一次超时可能在 正在刷新队列时运

CVSS 7.8 · High EPSS 0.13% · P2

Possible ATT&CK Techniques 1 AI

T1190 · Exploit Public-Facing Application

Affected Version Matrix 8

VendorProduct Version RangeStatus
Linux Linux fb3bbcfe344e64a46574a638b051ffd78762c12d< 621c365739828900f32a0c1cdfe5387528a62176 affected
fb3bbcfe344e64a46574a638b051ffd78762c12d< 934bd95f1a6404dbb845951b823547abab05a649 affected
fb3bbcfe344e64a46574a638b051ffd78762c12d< d2710c8d938ae6a825a6463158e6e6f31eac792a affected
6.15 affected
< 6.15 unaffected
6.18.54≤ 6.18.* unaffected
7.2.8≤ 7.2.* unaffected
7.3-rc4≤ * unaffected
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilities Log in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2026-98256

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
signal: Prevent exec() race
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: signal: Prevent exec() race Hyunwoo debugged the following KASAN UAF splat: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __send_signal_locked+0xb27/0xba0 Write of size 8 at addr ffff888007ed80c8 by task poc/79 ... Call Trace: __send_signal_locked+0xb27/0xba0 do_send_sig_info+0xa7/0x160 do_send_specific+0x76/0xa0 __x64_sys_tgkill+0x193/0x270 ... Allocated by task 80: do_timer_create+0x1a4/0x1030 __x64_sys_timer_create+0x145/0x190 ... Freed by task 12: kmem_cache_free_bulk+0x1f8/0x4a0 kvfree_rcu_bulk+0x14f/0x1c0 kfree_rcu_work+0x128/0x1a0 ... Last potentially related work creation: kvfree_call_rcu+0x39/0x390 __flush_itimer_signals+0x211/0x320 flush_itimer_signals+0x47/0x90 begin_new_exec+0xa6b/0x28c0 It turned out that this happens with a non-leader exec() as Hyunwoo explained: de_thread() calls exchange_tids() before release_task(leader), so the struct pid held by a SIGEV_THREAD_ID timer created against the leader's tid now points to the thread which called execve(). pid_task() returns that thread and lock_task_sighand() on it succeeds. If the timer signal is blocked, its sigqueue stays queued on the leader's task::pending. The next expiry of that timer can then run while release_task() flushes the queue. posixtimer_send_sigqueue() checks whether the sigqueue is already queued with a plain list_empty(), which only reads list_head::next. list_del_init() is not atomic and INIT_LIST_HEAD() stores list_head::next before list_head::prev, so the check can pass in between. list_add_tail() queues the entry on the task::pending of the live thread, and the list_head::prev store from the flush then overwrites the list_head::prev link that list_add_tail() has just set. __flush_itimer_signals() does not undo that either. With list_head::prev pointing at the entry itself, its list_del_init() only stores the same values again, so the entry is not removed from the list. It is still there after the last reference is dropped and the timer is freed by RCU, and the list_add_tail() of a later tgkill() follows that list_head::prev into the freed timer. This problem surfaced with the recent commit which moved the sigqueue flush out of the sighand lock held region. Hyonwoo proposed to fix this by using list_del_init_careful(), but that just papers over the problem. After some disucssions and various attempts to solve it, Eric pointed out that there is no reason to flush task::pending late in release_task() and it should be done in exit_signals() already. As nothing can collect and deliver signals which are queued in a dying task's pending queue, there is no reason to delay it further. But it has to be ensured that no signals can be queued into it after that point. exit_signals() sets PF_EXITING in task::flags, which can be used as an indicator for this. Cure it by: - Preventing signal queueing for task private signals (PIDTYPE_PID) when the task has PF_EXITING set in __send_signal_locked() and in posixtimer_send_sigqueue(). - Protecting the unlocked setting of PF_EXITING in exit_signals() for the task group empty and the group exit case with sighand lock - Flushing task::pending signals right there. Optimize that by moving the whole pending list to an on-stack list head under sighand lock and free the signals without the lock held. There has been quite some discussion about the lockless flush and the non-leader exec case on weakly ordered systems. The problem is that a third party which tries to send a posix timer signal relies on the PID lookup to find the target task and that lookup might result in the new leader when the signal was originaly directed to the old leader. In case that the signal was queued on the old leader then the lockless flush raised a concern over the following situation: old_leader new_leader third party A: flush_list() // list_del_in ---truncated---
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5

Affected Products

Vendor Product Affected Versions CPE Subscribe
Linux Linux fb3bbcfe344e64a46574a638b051ffd78762c12d ~ 621c365739828900f32a0c1cdfe5387528a62176 -
Linux Linux 6.15 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2026-98256

# POC Description Source Link Shenlong Link
AI-Generated POC Premium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2026-98256

请登录查看更多情报信息。

Patches & Fixes for CVE-2026-98256 (3)

Same Patch Batch · Linux · 2026-10-06 · 208 CVEs total

CVE-2026-98323 9.8 CRITICAL RDMA/siw: Bound fragmented header copies by the remaining length
CVE-2026-98365 9.8 CRITICAL RDMA/rxe: Fix integer overflow in mr_check_range() leading to OOB access
CVE-2026-98282 8.8 HIGH powerpc/iommu: Fix the overflow validation in iommu_tce_check_ioba
CVE-2026-98283 8.8 HIGH KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: fix use-after-free in kvmhv_emulate_tlbie_all_lpid()
CVE-2026-98339 8.8 HIGH wifi: cfg80211: don't filter by BSS type when removing stale entries
CVE-2026-98171 8.8 HIGH smb: client: fix next_buffer UAF and NextCommand bounds in compound PDUs
CVE-2026-98261 8.1 HIGH cifs: Fix server use-after-free in cifs_chan_skip_or_disable()
CVE-2026-98357 8.1 HIGH IB/isert: wait for deferred control PDU completions before releasing the connection
CVE-2026-98239 8.1 HIGH net: lan743x: fix RX checksum use-after-free
CVE-2026-98341 7.8 HIGH wifi: cfg80211: don't free driver-owned scan requests
CVE-2026-98324 7.8 HIGH dmaengine: pxa: fix double counting of the hw descriptors
CVE-2026-98320 7.8 HIGH netfilter: flowtable: hold reference on ct until flow is released
CVE-2026-98228 7.8 HIGH mips: select CONFIG_WEAK_REORDERING_BEYOND_LLSC from CONFIG_EYEQ
CVE-2026-98229 7.8 HIGH xfrm: save input state data before secpath resets
CVE-2026-98318 7.8 HIGH smb: client: validate absolute native symlink targets before NT fixups
CVE-2026-98315 7.8 HIGH ntfs: protect runlist updates with the runlist lock
CVE-2026-98276 7.8 HIGH net: lock the socket in sock_gettstamp()
CVE-2026-98258 7.8 HIGH posix-cpu-timers: Prevent freeing a timer which is queued on the expiry list
CVE-2026-98260 7.8 HIGH exec: Cleanup POSIX timers right after de_thread()
CVE-2026-98254 7.8 HIGH swiotlb: use the adjusted address for the highmem page lookup

Showing top 20 of 208 CVEs. View all on vendor page &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-98256

No comments yet


Leave a comment