IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 至 1.0.2 版本存在安全属性缺失的漏洞,导致敏感 Cookie 可能通过未加密的连接传输,攻击者可能借此利用基于网络的攻击手段截获会话数据。
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| Vendor | Product | Affected Versions | CPE | Subscribe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | CyberFraud | 1.0.0 ~ 1.0.2 |
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:cyber_fraud:1.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
|
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-81212 | 10.0 CRITICAL | DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data Improper Authorization |
| CVE-2026-92559 | 9.8 CRITICAL | IBM App Connect Enterprise is vulnerable to a credential exposure |
| CVE-2026-76587 | 8.8 HIGH | IBM Planning Analytics Buffer Overflow |
| CVE-2026-93441 | 8.6 HIGH | IBM QRadar SIEM HTTP Receiver protocol is vulnerable to a denial of service |
| CVE-2026-93442 | 8.2 HIGH | IBM QRadar SIEM Out-of-bounds Read |
| CVE-2026-82891 | 8.1 HIGH | IBM Guardium Data Protection is affected by a security vulnerability |
| CVE-2026-93888 | 7.8 HIGH | IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for Unix Buffer Overflow |
| CVE-2026-87800 | 6.8 MEDIUM | IBM Cyber Fraud includes components with multiple known vulnerabilities |
| CVE-2026-93744 | 6.5 MEDIUM | IBM i Improper Authentication |
| CVE-2026-94402 | 6.1 MEDIUM | IBM vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) via unsanitized title truncation |
No comments yet