Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CVE-2026-98542— cgroup/cpuset: Return PERR_NOCPUS in remote_partition_enable() on subpartitions_cpus conflict

Quick assessment

Affected
Linux Linux
Exploitation
No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation; assess based on exposure
Recommended action
Check the vendor advisory and references for a fixed version. If immediate upgrade is impossible, restrict exposure and increase monitoring.

在 Linux 内核中,以下漏洞已得到修复: cgroup/cpuset:当子分区 CPU 发生冲突时,在 remote_partition_enable() 中返回 PERR_NOCPUS 当通过一个非分区(PRS_MEMBER)中间 cgroup,在已有的本地分区之下创建远程分区时,update_prstate() 会检测到 parent->partition_root_state 等于 PRS_MEMBER,进而调用 remote_partition_enable()。 提交 86888c7bd117("cg

AI Predicted 5.5 Difficulty: Moderate

Affected Version Matrix 8

VendorProduct Version RangeStatus
Linux Linux 86888c7bd117c29eab169c37e5f6bbbf583da983< 241e67b60308cdce25bba66616a109759edd1d40 affected
86888c7bd117c29eab169c37e5f6bbbf583da983< 0751ab665cb3dcdac224b002565f2e28461740d5 affected
86888c7bd117c29eab169c37e5f6bbbf583da983< 31c88350b7dd1522792f726f79607f31bb55c50f affected
6.16 affected
< 6.16 unaffected
6.18.55≤ 6.18.* unaffected
7.2.9≤ 7.2.* unaffected
7.3-rc5≤ * unaffected
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilities Log in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2026-98542

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
cgroup/cpuset: Return PERR_NOCPUS in remote_partition_enable() on subpartitions_cpus conflict
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cgroup/cpuset: Return PERR_NOCPUS in remote_partition_enable() on subpartitions_cpus conflict When a remote partition is created underneath an existing local partition via a non-partition (PRS_MEMBER) intermediate cgroup, update_prstate() sees parent->partition_root_state == PRS_MEMBER and calls remote_partition_enable(). Commit 86888c7bd117 ("cgroup/cpuset: Add warnings to catch inconsistency in exclusive CPUs") replaced the cpumask_intersects(tmp->new_cpus, subpartitions_cpus) error check in remote_partition_enable() with WARN_ON_ONCE(). As a result, remote_partition_enable() emits a warning and proceeds to enable the remote partition on CPUs that are already owned by the ancestor local partition in subpartitions_cpus. This can be reproduced on Linux 7.3.0-rc3 with: mkdir -p /tmp/cg1 mount -t cgroup2 none /tmp/cg1 echo "+cpuset" > /tmp/cg1/cgroup.subtree_control mkdir /tmp/cg1/A echo 1 > /tmp/cg1/A/cpuset.cpus echo 1 > /tmp/cg1/A/cpuset.cpus.exclusive echo root > /tmp/cg1/A/cpuset.cpus.partition echo "+cpuset" > /tmp/cg1/A/cgroup.subtree_control mkdir /tmp/cg1/A/B echo 1 > /tmp/cg1/A/B/cpuset.cpus echo 1 > /tmp/cg1/A/B/cpuset.cpus.exclusive echo "+cpuset" > /tmp/cg1/A/B/cgroup.subtree_control mkdir /tmp/cg1/A/B/D echo 1 > /tmp/cg1/A/B/D/cpuset.cpus echo 1 > /tmp/cg1/A/B/D/cpuset.cpus.exclusive echo root > /tmp/cg1/A/B/D/cpuset.cpus.partition which triggers: WARNING: kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:1594 at remote_partition_enable+0x1c1/0x300 and leaves both /tmp/cg1/A and /tmp/cg1/A/B/D as active root partitions claiming exclusive CPU 1. Fix this by returning PERR_NOCPUS when tmp->new_cpus intersects subpartitions_cpus in remote_partition_enable(), matching the error code used by remote_cpus_update() for the same subpartitions_cpus conflict, and add a regression test case to tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh. Tested in QEMU on Linux 7.3.0-rc3 using the reproducer above and tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_cpuset_prs.sh.
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5

Affected Products

Vendor Product Affected Versions CPE Subscribe
Linux Linux 86888c7bd117c29eab169c37e5f6bbbf583da983 ~ 241e67b60308cdce25bba66616a109759edd1d40 -
Linux Linux 6.16 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2026-98542

# POC Description Source Link Shenlong Link
AI-Generated POC Premium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2026-98542

请登录查看更多情报信息。

Patches & Fixes for CVE-2026-98542 (2)

Same Patch Batch · Linux · 2026-10-18 · 436 CVEs total

CVE-2026-98583 nfc: nfcmrvl: validate helper command length before pull
CVE-2026-98570 net: ipv6: keep room for the mac header in dst_dev_overhead()
CVE-2026-98571 net: stmmac: clear stale buf->page after recycling on skb build failure
CVE-2026-98572 bpf: Fix immediate JMP JEQ/JNE on MIPS32
CVE-2026-98573 net: skbuff: fix pull-bound underflow in skb_checksum_setup_ipv6()
CVE-2026-98574 net: bcmgenet: stop Tx NAPI before disabling the queues
CVE-2026-98575 nfc: pn533: fix OOB read in pn533_acr122_is_rx_frame_valid()
CVE-2026-98576 nfc: llcp: fix slab-out-of-bounds reads when logging service names
CVE-2026-98577 nfc: llcp: fix WKS SAP hijacking via prefix match in nfc_llcp_wks_sap()
CVE-2026-98578 nfc: st21nfca: validate ISO15693 inventory length
CVE-2026-98579 nfc: llcp: fix sdreq TLV list leak on parse/alloc/send failure
CVE-2026-98580 nfc: llcp: Fix race condition in accept_queue lifecycle
CVE-2026-98581 nfc: llcp: Fix list corruption / refcount desync in nfc_llcp_recv_dm()
CVE-2026-98582 nfc: st21nfca: validate received frame size
CVE-2026-98594 tg3: clean up PHYLIB resources on probe failure
CVE-2026-98591 bpf: Fix bounds check for skb-backed dynptrs
CVE-2026-98592 net: spacemit: clear TX descriptor on fragment mapping failure
CVE-2026-98593 s390/debug: Fix NULL pointer dereference in debug_info_copy()
CVE-2026-98590 bpf: Fix bpf_sock context code generation
CVE-2026-98595 udp: remove a disconnected socket from the 4-tuple hash table

Showing top 20 of 436 CVEs. View all on vendor page &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-98542

No comments yet


Leave a comment