目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1359 元

100%

CVE-2026-98980— namei 遍历中过度挂载条目信息泄露漏洞

一分钟漏洞结论

影响对象
Linux Linux
利用判断
尚无明确在野利用证据,仍需结合暴露面评估
建议动作
优先检查厂商安全公告和参考链接中的修复版本;无法立即升级时,限制受影响服务暴露并加强监测。

在 Linux 内核中,以下漏洞已得到修复: namei:在 refwalk 中不泄露被覆盖挂载的目录项 在 机制中,目录项(dentry)在被接受之前会经过验证。 函数会重新检查 ,而 会重新检查 。如果某个目录项在中间被unlink(删除链接),则会导致查找重试并失败(即无法找到该目录项)。 然而, 机制并不执行上述检查。 仅对哈希表中的目录项获取引用,然后直接接受它。因此,如果在获取引用之后发生 unlink 操作, 将无法感知。对于普通文件而言,这通常没有问题——我们只是在它被删除前打开了它,并无大碍。 但

CVSS 8.8 · High EPSS 0.21% · P11

影响版本矩阵 10

厂商产品 版本范围状态
Linux Linux 8ed936b5671bfb33d89bc60bdcc7cf0470ba52fe< e2b10181d913b4efa3a8dc67a532f859aa5f95e0 affected
8ed936b5671bfb33d89bc60bdcc7cf0470ba52fe< 5f97df8ca7fadf5b53954f50073445ba193902c0 affected
8ed936b5671bfb33d89bc60bdcc7cf0470ba52fe< b43ff2deef48260bfbdc0dcb520f7929bd3e4007 affected
8ed936b5671bfb33d89bc60bdcc7cf0470ba52fe< 8189ab688f5a2c745dc90b63374da02f213d6994 affected
3.18 affected
< 3.18 unaffected
6.12.113≤ 6.12.* unaffected
6.18.57≤ 6.18.* unaffected
… +2 条更多
获取后续新漏洞提醒 登录后订阅

一、 漏洞 CVE-2026-98980 基础信息

漏洞信息

对漏洞内容有疑问?看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助!
查看神龙十问 ↗

尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术,但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性,但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。

Vulnerability Title
namei: don't reveal overmounted entries in refwalk
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: namei: don't reveal overmounted entries in refwalk In rcuwalk the dentry is validated before it is accepted. step_into() step_into() rechecks d_seq and __follow_mount_rcu() rechecks mount_lock. An entry that gets unlinked in between causes the lookup to retry and miss. A refwalk doesn't do this. lookup_fast() takes a reference on the hashed dentry and simply accepts it. So an unlink that happens after the reference was taken isn't seen by refwalk. That's fine for a simple file. We just happened to open it before it was unlinked, no problem. For a mountpoint and specifically a locked mountpoint it very much isn't. The unlink detaches all mounts and then removes the name. Any refwalk that hasn't traversed the mounts yet simply reveals the underlying entry. It's a very narrow window but it can be hit: reads of a covered file in 60 s, 3 walkers, ~15000 unlinks no widening 27 that step + 200 us 3741 See the appended patch for a more reliable reproducer. So check the entry after step_into(). unlink(), rmdir() and rename() mark the dentry with dont_mount() before they detach the mounts and remove the dentry. So a dentry that is marked with DCACHE_CANT_MOUNT and is unhashed by the time its mounts were looked at is a name that was unlinked under the refwalk. DCACHE_CANT_MOUNT is read after the mounts were looked up and it is set before they are detached by detach_mounts(). A refwalk that missed the mounts will see DCACHE_CANT_MOUNT. Plain d_unlinked() is fine. A rename takes the dentry off its hash chain but ___d_drop() leaves d_hash.pprev set. So only __d_drop() and a rename over the dentry unhash it. The only move that flips IS_ROOT splices in a disconnected alias. That doesn't have DCACHE_CANT_MOUNT set. Add the to step_into_slowpath(). ".." and LOOKUP_DOWN may legitimately land on an unhashed directory. A refwalk that crossed onto a mount has path.mnt different from nd->path.mnt. A dentry that a filesystem dropped on its own (d_invalidate(), d_drop()) doesn't have the flag set and is treated as before. // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 /* * unlink_covered: unlink a file that is a mountpoint in a detached copy of * its mount, against walkers that open it through that copy. * * A is a tmpfs with the file f1 (content SECRET_F) and the plain file * MARK_A. A' is an open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE) copy of A with MARK_A bound * on A'/f1, held through an O_PATH fd on its root once the tree fd is * closed. Walkers open f1 through that fd while the driver unlinks A/f1, * where nothing is mounted on it. A walker may read MARK_A or get ENOENT. * A read of SECRET_F is a hit: the name was found after its mount was * gone. The lockless walks use openat2(RESOLVE_CACHED). * * usage: unlink_covered [-t seconds] [-w walkers] */ #ifndef _GNU_SOURCE #define _GNU_SOURCE #endif #include <errno.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <pthread.h> #include <stdatomic.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/mount.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <sys/syscall.h> #include <linux/openat2.h> #ifndef __NR_open_tree #define __NR_open_tree 428 #endif #ifndef __NR_move_mount #define __NR_move_mount 429 #endif #ifndef __NR_openat2 #define __NR_openat2 437 #endif #ifndef OPEN_TREE_CLONE #define OPEN_TREE_CLONE 1 #endif #ifndef OPEN_TREE_CLOEXEC #define OPEN_TREE_CLOEXEC O_CLOEXEC #endif #ifndef MOVE_MOUNT_F_EMPTY_PATH #define MOVE_MOUNT_F_EMPTY_PATH 0x00000004 #endif #define WORK "/tmp/uc" #define ADIR WORK "/A" static int duration = 60, nwalkers = 3; static atomic_int stop, writer_waiting; static pthread_rwlock_t cur_lock = PTHREAD_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER; static int cur_fd = -1; /* the root of A', -1 while there is none */ static atomic_long n_unlink, n_walk, n_mark, n_enoent, n_othe ---truncated---
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
N/A
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5

受影响产品

厂商 产品 影响版本 CPE 订阅
Linux Linux 8ed936b5671bfb33d89bc60bdcc7cf0470ba52fe ~ e2b10181d913b4efa3a8dc67a532f859aa5f95e0 -
Linux Linux 3.18 -

二、漏洞 CVE-2026-98980 的公开POC

# POC 描述 源链接 神龙链接
AI 生成 POC 高级

未找到公开 POC。

登录以生成 AI POC

三、漏洞 CVE-2026-98980 的情报信息

请登录查看更多情报信息。

CVE-2026-98980 补丁与修复 (3)

同批安全公告 · Linux · 2026-10-23 · 共 218 条

CVE-2026-98959 9.8 CRITICAL btrfs 扩展属性替换处理远程代码执行漏洞
CVE-2026-99079 9.8 CRITICAL Mellanox mlx5e 驱动 XSK 缓冲区释放漏洞
CVE-2026-99078 9.8 CRITICAL Mellanox mlx5e MPWQE重试时XSK缓冲区释放漏洞
CVE-2026-98870 8.8 HIGH ksmbd 会话清理时存在通道移除逻辑漏洞
CVE-2026-98981 8.8 HIGH Linux 内核命名空间 dentry 解挂载前未哈希漏洞
CVE-2026-99083 8.8 HIGH ksmbd 的 krb5_authenticate() 函数堆越界写漏洞
CVE-2026-99082 8.8 HIGH KVM x86 内存管理漏洞
CVE-2026-98988 8.8 HIGH Linux 5.13 命名空间越界漏洞
CVE-2026-98978 8.4 HIGH Linux 命名空间 锁定挂载永不失效漏洞
CVE-2026-99042 8.4 HIGH io_uring 24 字节 sockaddr_in6 过滤字段填充漏洞
CVE-2026-98968 8.1 HIGH AMT 中继通用查询远程代码执行漏洞
CVE-2026-99064 8.1 HIGH CIPSO 缓存选项偏移调整漏洞
CVE-2026-99050 7.8 HIGH GPIO MPSSE 驱动 IRQ 轮询竞态漏洞
CVE-2026-99032 7.8 HIGH Linux 内核 SMC 模块 信息泄露漏洞
CVE-2026-98899 7.8 HIGH Linux netfilter ipset 竞态条件漏洞
CVE-2026-98976 7.8 HIGH Linux 内核命名空间挂载传播锁漏洞
CVE-2026-98889 7.8 HIGH iwlwifi 驱动调度扫描 IE 大小计算漏洞
CVE-2026-99054 7.8 HIGH Linux TIPC 拓扑服务队列资源泄漏漏洞
CVE-2026-99053 7.8 HIGH Linux TIPC 节点引用漏洞
CVE-2026-98991 7.8 HIGH Linux 内核队列命名空间挂载通知重复漏洞

显示前 20 条,共 218 条。 查看全部 &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-98980

暂无评论


发表评论