Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-190 (整数溢出或超界折返) — Vulnerability Class 1195

1195 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-190 (整数溢出或超界折返). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-190 represents a critical logic flaw where arithmetic operations exceed the maximum capacity of the assigned integer data type, causing the value to wrap around to a negative number or zero. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by manipulating input values to trigger the overflow, thereby bypassing security checks that assume the resulting number remains positive or within expected bounds. This often leads to severe consequences such as buffer overflows, memory corruption, or unauthorized access. To prevent such issues, developers must implement rigorous input validation and use safe arithmetic libraries that detect potential overflows before execution. Additionally, employing static analysis tools and adhering to secure coding standards ensures that integer calculations are handled with appropriate bounds checking, effectively mitigating the risk of wraparound errors in production environments.

MITRE CWE Description
The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.
Common Consequences (5)
Availability DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory), DoS: Instability
This weakness can generally lead to undefined behavior and therefore crashes. When the calculated result is used for resource allocation, this weakness can cause too many (or too few) resources to be allocated, possibly enabling crashes if the product requests more resources than can be provided.
Integrity Modify Memory
If the value in question is important to data (as opposed to flow), simple data corruption has occurred. Also, if the overflow/wraparound results in other conditions such as buffer overflows, further memory corruption may occur.
Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
This weakness can sometimes trigger buffer overflows, which can be used to execute arbitrary code. This is usually outside the scope of the product's implicit security policy.
Availability, Other Alter Execution Logic, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
If the overflow/wraparound occurs in a loop index variable, this could cause the loop to terminate at the wrong time - too early, too late, or not at all (i.e., infinite loops). With too many iterations, some loops could consume too many resources such as memory, file handles, etc., possibly leading…
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
If integer values are used in security-critical decisions, such as calculating quotas or allocation limits, integer overflows can be used to cause an incorrect security decision.
Mitigations (5)
Requirements Ensure that all protocols are strictly defined, such that all out-of-bounds behavior can be identified simply, and require strict conformance to the protocol.
Requirements Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. If possible, choose a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Use libraries or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences. Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++). [REF-106]
Implementation Perform input validation on any numeric input by ensuring that it is within the expected range. Enforce that the input meets both the minimum and maximum requirements for the expected range. Use unsigned integers where possible. This makes it easier to perform validation for integer overflows. When signed integers are required, ensure that the range check includes minimum values as well as maximum…
Implementation Understand the programming language's underlying representation and how it interacts with numeric calculation (CWE-681). Pay close attention to byte size discrepancies, precision, signed/unsigned distinctions, truncation, conversion and casting between types, "not-a-number" calculations, and how the language handles numbers that are too large or too small for its underlying representation. [REF-7]…
Examples (2)
The following image processing code allocates a table for images.
img_t table_ptr; /*struct containing img data, 10kB each*/ int num_imgs; ... num_imgs = get_num_imgs(); table_ptr = (img_t*)malloc(sizeof(img_t)*num_imgs); ...
Bad · C
The following code excerpt from OpenSSH 3.3 demonstrates a classic case of integer overflow:
nresp = packet_get_int(); if (nresp > 0) { response = xmalloc(nresp*sizeof(char*)); for (i = 0; i < nresp; i++) response[i] = packet_get_string(NULL); }
Bad · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2022-0913 Integer Overflow or Wraparound in microweber/microweber — microweber/microweber 7.5 - 2022-03-11
CVE-2021-42019 Siemens RUGGEDCOM 输入验证错误漏洞 — RUGGEDCOM i800 5.9 Medium 2022-03-08
CVE-2021-3428 Linux kernel 输入验证错误漏洞 — kernel 5.5 - 2022-03-04
CVE-2021-20300 ILM OpenEXR 输入验证错误漏洞 — OpenEXR 5.5 - 2022-03-04
CVE-2021-20303 ILM OpenEXR 输入验证错误漏洞 — OpenEXR 6.1 - 2022-03-04
CVE-2022-24724 Integer overflow in table parsing extension leads to heap memory corruption — cmark-gfm 8.8 High 2022-03-03
CVE-2021-3607 QEMU 输入验证错误漏洞 — QEMU 6.0 - 2022-02-24
CVE-2022-0546 Blender 输入验证错误漏洞 — Blender 7.8 - 2022-02-24
CVE-2022-0545 Blender输入验证错误漏洞 — Blender 7.8 - 2022-02-24
CVE-2022-24354 Tp-link AC1750 输入验证错误漏洞 — AC1750 8.8 - 2022-02-18
CVE-2022-0185 Linux kernel 数字错误漏洞 — kernel 8.4 - 2022-02-11
CVE-2022-24667 swift-nio-http2 输入验证错误漏洞 — SwiftNIO HTTP2 7.5 - 2022-02-09
CVE-2022-24310 Interactive Graphical SCADA System Data Server 输入验证错误漏洞 — Interactive Graphical SCADA System Data Server (V15.0.0.22020 and prior) 9.8 - 2022-02-09
CVE-2022-23558 Integer overflow in TFLite array creation — tensorflow 7.6 High 2022-02-04
CVE-2022-23562 Integer overflow in Tensorflow — tensorflow 7.6 High 2022-02-04
CVE-2022-23559 Integer overflow in TFLite — tensorflow 8.8 High 2022-02-04
CVE-2022-23575 Integer overflow in Tensorflow — tensorflow 6.5 Medium 2022-02-04
CVE-2022-23576 Integer overflow in Tensorflow — tensorflow 6.5 Medium 2022-02-04
CVE-2022-23587 Integer overflow in Tensorflow — tensorflow 8.8 High 2022-02-04
CVE-2022-21801 Reolink RLC-410W 输入验证错误漏洞 — n/a 7.5 - 2022-01-28
CVE-2021-44711 Adobe Acrobat Reader DC annotation gestures integer overflow vulnerability — Acrobat Reader 7.8 High 2022-01-14
CVE-2021-43784 Overflow in netlink bytemsg length field allows attacker to override netlink-based container configuration — runc 6.0 Medium 2021-12-06
CVE-2021-26615 bandisoft ARK library integer overflow vulnerability — ARK 7.8 High 2021-11-26
CVE-2020-7881 AfreecaTV streamer service stack-based buffer overflow — afreecatvstreamer.exe 7.5 High 2021-11-26
CVE-2021-41197 Crashes due to overflow and `CHECK`-fail in ops with large tensor shapes — tensorflow 5.5 Medium 2021-11-05
CVE-2021-41198 Overflow/crash in `tf.tile` when tiling tensor is large — tensorflow 5.5 Medium 2021-11-05
CVE-2021-41199 Overflow/crash in `tf.image.resize` when size is large — tensorflow 5.5 Medium 2021-11-05
CVE-2021-41195 Crash in `tf.math.segment_*` operations — tensorflow 5.5 Medium 2021-11-05
CVE-2021-27665 exacqVision Server 32-bit — exacqVision Web Service 7.5 High 2021-10-11
CVE-2021-41099 Integer overflow issue with strings in Redis — redis 7.5 High 2021-10-04

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-190 (整数溢出或超界折返) represent 1195 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.