Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-190 (整数溢出或超界折返) — Vulnerability Class 1231

1231 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-190 (整数溢出或超界折返). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-190 represents a critical logic flaw where arithmetic operations exceed the maximum capacity of the assigned integer data type, causing the value to wrap around to a negative number or zero. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by manipulating input values to trigger the overflow, thereby bypassing security checks that assume the resulting number remains positive or within expected bounds. This often leads to severe consequences such as buffer overflows, memory corruption, or unauthorized access. To prevent such issues, developers must implement rigorous input validation and use safe arithmetic libraries that detect potential overflows before execution. Additionally, employing static analysis tools and adhering to secure coding standards ensures that integer calculations are handled with appropriate bounds checking, effectively mitigating the risk of wraparound errors in production environments.

MITRE CWE Description
The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.
Common Consequences (5)
Availability DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory), DoS: Instability
This weakness can generally lead to undefined behavior and therefore crashes. When the calculated result is used for resource allocation, this weakness can cause too many (or too few) resources to be allocated, possibly enabling crashes if the product requests more resources than can be provided.
Integrity Modify Memory
If the value in question is important to data (as opposed to flow), simple data corruption has occurred. Also, if the overflow/wraparound results in other conditions such as buffer overflows, further memory corruption may occur.
Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
This weakness can sometimes trigger buffer overflows, which can be used to execute arbitrary code. This is usually outside the scope of the product's implicit security policy.
Availability, Other Alter Execution Logic, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
If the overflow/wraparound occurs in a loop index variable, this could cause the loop to terminate at the wrong time - too early, too late, or not at all (i.e., infinite loops). With too many iterations, some loops could consume too many resources such as memory, file handles, etc., possibly leading…
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
If integer values are used in security-critical decisions, such as calculating quotas or allocation limits, integer overflows can be used to cause an incorrect security decision.
Mitigations (5)
Requirements Ensure that all protocols are strictly defined, such that all out-of-bounds behavior can be identified simply, and require strict conformance to the protocol.
Requirements Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. If possible, choose a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Use libraries or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences. Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++). [REF-106]
Implementation Perform input validation on any numeric input by ensuring that it is within the expected range. Enforce that the input meets both the minimum and maximum requirements for the expected range. Use unsigned integers where possible. This makes it easier to perform validation for integer overflows. When signed integers are required, ensure that the range check includes minimum values as well as maximum…
Implementation Understand the programming language's underlying representation and how it interacts with numeric calculation (CWE-681). Pay close attention to byte size discrepancies, precision, signed/unsigned distinctions, truncation, conversion and casting between types, "not-a-number" calculations, and how the language handles numbers that are too large or too small for its underlying representation. [REF-7]…
Examples (2)
The following image processing code allocates a table for images.
img_t table_ptr; /*struct containing img data, 10kB each*/ int num_imgs; ... num_imgs = get_num_imgs(); table_ptr = (img_t*)malloc(sizeof(img_t)*num_imgs); ...
Bad · C
The following code excerpt from OpenSSH 3.3 demonstrates a classic case of integer overflow:
nresp = packet_get_int(); if (nresp > 0) { response = xmalloc(nresp*sizeof(char*)); for (i = 0; i < nresp; i++) response[i] = packet_get_string(NULL); }
Bad · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-79292 Google Chrome 数字错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-59982 OpenEXR: DWAA InputFile AC buffer overflow on ILP32 platforms — openexr 7.1 High 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-18445 Integer Overflow Vulnerability Resulting in an Out of Bounds Write in NI LabVIEW — LabVIEW 6.6 Medium 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-59183 OpenEXR: Signed Integer Overflow Leading to Out-of-Bounds Memory Access in Deep Tile Decoding — openexr 5.5 Medium 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-55373 OpenEXR: OpenEXRUtil SampleCountChannel endEdit() can loop forever on UINT_MAX sample counts — openexr 6.2 Medium 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-54920 OpenEXR: Integer overflow and uninitialized pointer cause invalid delete in OpenEXRUtil image resize — openexr - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-78465 Gimp: integer overflow in pcx loader (planes=4) leads to heap overflow on 32-bit — GIMP 7.0 High 2026-08-24
CVE-2026-77219 GNU Emacs < 31.0.91 Heap Over-Read via PBM/PPM/PGM Image Loader — Emacs 7.1 High 2026-08-21
CVE-2026-18670 Vulnerabilities in IBM AIX and PowerVM VIOS — AIX 8.2 High 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-17160 Vulnerabilities in IBM AIX and PowerVM VIOS — AIX 9.8 Critical 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-17159 Vulnerabilities in IBM AIX and PowerVM VIOS — AIX 7.5 High 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-69419 Azure Data Manager for Energy Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Azure Data Manager for Energy 8.5 High 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-72854 msgpack-c Integer Overflow in msgpack_unpacker_expand_buffer Causes a False-Success Undersized Reservation — msgpack-c 5.3 Medium 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-72852 darknet Integer Overflow in Convolutional Layer Buffer Sizing Leads to Heap Buffer Overflow — darknet 7.8 High 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-63384 Libevent: `evtag_unmarshal_header()` decodes a wire `uint32` length into a signed `int` return value. — libevent 8.7 High 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-18309 GIMP APNG File Parsing Integer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — GIMP - - 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-18308 GIMP TIF File Parsing Integer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — GIMP - - 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-18306 GIMP SGI File Parsing Integer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — GIMP - - 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-18305 GIMP TIF File Parsing Integer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — GIMP - - 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-18304 GIMP TIF File Parsing Integer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — GIMP - - 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-18301 GIMP PSD File Parsing Integer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — GIMP - - 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-18300 GIMP HDR File Parsing Integer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — GIMP - - 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-18917 Libvirt: integer overflow in nodegetfreepages rpc handler leading to heap buffer overflow — Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 7.8 High 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-68552 Coturn: uint16_t truncation overflow in STUN message length causes TCP stream framing bypass — coturn 5.3 Medium 2026-08-19
CVE-2026-16917 Vulnerabilities in IBM AIX and PowerVM VIOS — AIX 9.8 Critical 2026-08-19
CVE-2026-16890 Vulnerabilities in IBM AIX and PowerVM VIOS — AIX 3.6 Low 2026-08-19
CVE-2026-17091 Power System Integer Overflow — PowerVM Hypervisor 8.4 High 2026-08-19
CVE-2026-16724 Power System Integer Overflow — Virtualization Management Interface 4.5 Medium 2026-08-19
CVE-2026-16852 Vulnerabilities in IBM AIX and PowerVM VIOS — AIX 7.5 High 2026-08-19
CVE-2026-16661 Power System Integer Overflow — PowerVM Hypervisor 8.2 High 2026-08-19

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-190 (整数溢出或超界折返) represent 1231 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.