Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) — Vulnerability Class 4420

4420 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-20 represents a critical software weakness where applications fail to properly verify the integrity, format, or type of incoming data before processing it. This oversight allows attackers to inject malicious payloads, such as SQL injection strings or cross-site scripting code, which can bypass security controls and compromise system integrity. Exploitation typically occurs when untrusted data from external sources, like user forms or network packets, is treated as executable code or trusted input. To mitigate this risk, developers must implement rigorous input validation strategies, including strict type checking, length constraints, and allow-listing acceptable characters. Additionally, employing parameterized queries and output encoding ensures that even if validation fails, the injected data remains inert, thereby preserving application security and preventing unauthorized execution or data exposure.

MITRE CWE Description
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Input validation is a frequently-used technique for checking potentially dangerous inputs in order to ensure that the inputs are safe for processing within the code, or when communicating with other components. Input can consist of: raw data - strings, numbers, parameters, file contents, etc. metadata - information about the raw data, such as headers or size Data can be simple or structured. Structured data can be composed of many nested layers, composed of combinations of metadata and raw data, with other simple or structured data. Many properties of raw data or metadata may need to be validated upon entry into the code, such as: specified quantities such as size, length, frequency, price, rate, number of operations, time, etc. implied or derived quantities, such as the actual size of a file instead of a specified size indexes, offsets, or positions into more complex data structures symbolic keys or other elements into hash tables, associative arrays, etc. well-formedness, i.e. syntactic correctness - compliance with expected syntax lexical token correctness - compliance with rules for what is treated as a token specified or derived type - the actual type of the input (or what the input appears to be) consistency - between individual data el…
Common Consequences (3)
Availability DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
An attacker could provide unexpected values and cause a program crash or arbitrary control of resource allocation, leading to excessive consumption of resources such as memory and CPU.
Confidentiality Read Memory, Read Files or Directories
An attacker could read confidential data if they are able to control resource references.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
An attacker could use malicious input to modify data or possibly alter control flow in unexpected ways, including arbitrary command execution.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Consider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build "recognizers" for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subjec…
Architecture and Design Use an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
Architecture and Design, Implementation Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may b…
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Effectiveness: High
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server. Even though clien…
Examples (2)
This example demonstrates a shopping interaction in which the user is free to specify the quantity of items to be purchased and a total is calculated.
... public static final double price = 20.00; int quantity = currentUser.getAttribute("quantity"); double total = price * quantity; chargeUser(total); ...
Bad · Java
This example asks the user for a height and width of an m X n game board with a maximum dimension of 100 squares.
... #define MAX_DIM 100 ... /* board dimensions */ int m,n, error; board_square_t *board; printf("Please specify the board height: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &m); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } printf("Please specify the board width: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &n); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } if ( m > MAX_DIM || n > MAX_DIM ) { die("Value too large: Die evil hacker!\n"); } board = (board_square_t*) malloc( m * n * sizeof(board_square_t)); ...
Bad · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-79151 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-79214 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-79132 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-79013 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-79259 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-79251 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-78943 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-79066 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-79255 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-79065 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-79192 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-79109 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-79032 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-79106 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-79076 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-78900 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-79111 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-79288 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-79121 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-65979 OpenEXR: Out-of-bounds read in HTJ2K decoder from unvalidated chunk header length (PLEN) — openexr 6.7 Medium 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-71443 CAI Content Credentials | Improper Input Validation (CWE-20) — C2PA Tool 7.5 High 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-76198 CAI Content Credentials | Improper Input Validation (CWE-20) — C2PA Tool 5.5 Medium 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-34959 Adminer before 5.5.0 Open Redirect via X-Forwarded-Prefix — adminer 4.7 Medium 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-16434 Adminer before 5.5.1 X-Forwarded-Prefix Backslash Bypass — adminer 2.3 Low 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-55371 OpenEXR: OpenEXRCore exr_attr_set_bytes() accepts NULL type_hint with positive hint_length — openexr 6.9 Medium 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-72711 Lean 4 before 4.32.2 Kernel Accepts Opaque Declaration With an Unbound Free Variable — lean4 6.3 Medium 2026-08-24
CVE-2026-76816 Netty: MQTT Topic Name and Client ID Validation Bypass — netty 3.5 Low 2026-08-24
CVE-2026-78329 Apache Camel: Camel-Undertow: the endpoint discarded the undertow-specific header filter strategy in favour of the base HTTP one, so the undertow filtering never ran on endpoint-configured routes — Apache Camel - - 2026-08-24
CVE-2026-71300 Apache Camel: Camel-Atmosphere-Websocket: WebSocket dispatch header injection — Apache Camel - - 2026-08-24
CVE-2026-63621 Apache Camel: Camel-Knative: CloudEvent extension fields received in structured content mode were mapped onto message headers without applying any header filter strategy — Apache Camel - - 2026-08-24

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) represent 4420 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.