目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1359 元

100%

CWE-787 跨界内存写 类漏洞列表 3158

CWE-787 跨界内存写 类弱点 3158 条 CVE 漏洞汇总,含 AI 中文分析。

CWE-787 越界写入是一种严重的内存安全漏洞,指程序向缓冲区边界之外或起始位置之前写入数据。攻击者利用此缺陷可覆盖相邻内存,导致程序崩溃、数据损坏,甚至通过精心构造的 payload 实现任意代码执行,从而完全控制目标系统。开发者应避免此类风险,需严格实施边界检查,使用安全的内存管理函数,启用编译器防护机制,并遵循最小权限原则,确保所有内存访问均在合法范围内。

MITRE CWE 官方描述
CWE:CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write 英文:The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer. 译文:产品将数据写入预期缓冲区(buffer)的末尾之外或起始位置之前。
常见影响 (3)
Integrity Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Write operations could cause memory corruption. In some cases, an adversary can modify control data such as return addresses in order to execute unexpected code.
Availability DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
Attempting to access out-of-range, invalid, or unauthorized memory could cause the product to crash.
Other Unexpected State
Subsequent write operations can produce undefined or unexpected results.
缓解措施 (5)
Requirements Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and Compilation Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Implementation Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that the buffer is as large as specified. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a…
Operation, Build and Compilation Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
代码示例 (2)
The following code attempts to save four different identification numbers into an array.
int id_sequence[3]; /* Populate the id array. */ id_sequence[0] = 123; id_sequence[1] = 234; id_sequence[2] = 345; id_sequence[3] = 456;
Bad · C
In the following code, it is possible to request that memcpy move a much larger segment of memory than assumed:
int returnChunkSize(void *) { /* if chunk info is valid, return the size of usable memory, * else, return -1 to indicate an error */ ... } int main() { ... memcpy(destBuf, srcBuf, (returnChunkSize(destBuf)-1)); ... }
Bad · C
CVE ID 标题 CVSS 风险等级 Published
CVE-2026-86377 Dell PowerProtect Data Domain 多版本越界写漏洞 — PowerProtect Data Domain 7.6 High 2026-10-28
CVE-2026-118435 三星 escargot 越界写漏洞致缓冲区操纵 — escargot 5.4 Medium 2026-10-28
CVE-2026-118375 llama.cpp 栈溢出漏洞(ggml-rpc RDMA) — llama.cpp 8.1 High 2026-10-28
CVE-2026-118335 Chrome 156.0.8078.73 之前版本 Metrics 输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-27
CVE-2026-118313 Chrome 156.0.8078.73 前版本视频 Use-After-Free 漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-27
CVE-2026-57199 Asterisk app_sms.c 缓冲区溢出漏洞 — asterisk 2.3 Low 2026-10-27
CVE-2026-57188 Asterisk 栈缓冲区溢出漏洞(XMPP 前缀处理) — asterisk 7.1 High 2026-10-27
CVE-2026-57189 Asterisk 远程代码执行漏洞 — asterisk 2.3 Low 2026-10-27
CVE-2026-57201 Asterisk H.323 ooTrace() 栈缓冲区溢出漏洞 — asterisk 7.5 High 2026-10-27
CVE-2026-57194 Asterisk chan_unistim DIALPAGE 数字处理溢出崩溃漏洞 — asterisk 5.9 Medium 2026-10-27
CVE-2026-107590 Qt QTextCodec 越界写漏洞 — Qt 1.9 Low 2026-10-27
CVE-2026-47486 NVIDIA PhysX 全平台越界写入漏洞 — PhysX 7.8 High 2026-10-27
CVE-2026-86577 JP1 产品越界写入漏洞 — JP1/Integrated Management 3 - Manager 9.4 Critical 2026-10-27
CVE-2026-116842 DevilutionX 1.4.0-1.5.5 堆缓冲区溢出漏洞 — DevilutionX 6.1 Medium 2026-10-27
CVE-2026-116741 Speex 1.2.1 越界写入漏洞 — speex 6.5 Medium 2026-10-26
CVE-2026-116502 ExLlamaV2 越界写入漏洞 — ExLlamaV2 4.4 Medium 2026-10-26
CVE-2026-116543 Open5GS 1.3.0-2.8.0 堆越界写入漏洞 — open5gs 7.5 High 2026-10-26
CVE-2026-116539 Netty netty-tcnative 2.0.84 堆缓冲区溢出漏洞 — netty-tcnative 5.9 Medium 2026-10-26
CVE-2026-82945 FMMU 配置表溢出导致内存破坏漏洞 — SOEM 6.5 Medium 2026-10-26
CVE-2026-82944 CoE SDO 多段上传缓冲区溢出漏洞 — SOEM 8.8 High 2026-10-26
CVE-2026-107895 富士 V-SFT V7 文件越界写漏洞 — V-SFT 7.8 High 2026-10-26
CVE-2026-116099 Fusion Creators Studio 越界写入漏洞 — SCP Containment Breach Multiplayer 6.3 Medium 2026-10-25
CVE-2026-116096 llama.cpp Pocket-TTS 越界写漏洞 — llama.cpp 5.3 Medium 2026-10-25
CVE-2026-79982 USB 蓝牙 HCI 传输越界写入漏洞 — zephyr 8.8 High 2026-10-23
CVE-2026-79978 ADXL345 驱动 RTIO 流读取越界写漏洞 — zephyr 3.6 Low 2026-10-23
CVE-2026-115723 Snap7 1.4.3 越界写入漏洞 — snap7 7.4 High 2026-10-23
CVE-2026-115504 CFITSIO 4.7.0 getcols.c 越界写入漏洞 — cfitsio 7.8 High 2026-10-22
CVE-2026-115393 Wasmtime 多版本跨引擎类型混淆漏洞 — wasmtime 3.8 Low 2026-10-22
CVE-2026-111497 Google Brotli 越界写入漏洞 — Brotli 9.2 Critical 2026-10-22
CVE-2026-103634 Apache DataSketches 越界读写漏洞 — Apache DataSketches - - 2026-10-22

CWE-787(跨界内存写) 是常见的弱点类别,本平台收录该类弱点关联的 3158 条 CVE 漏洞。