Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-89 (SQL命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(SQL注入)) — Vulnerability Class 10255

10255 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-89 (SQL命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(SQL注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-89 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs SQL commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious SQL syntax into user-facing inputs, such as login fields or search queries, to manipulate the database’s behavior. This exploitation can lead to unauthorized data access, data modification, or complete system compromise by bypassing authentication or executing arbitrary commands. Developers mitigate this risk by implementing strict input validation and, most effectively, using parameterized queries or prepared statements. These techniques ensure that user input is treated strictly as data rather than executable code, thereby preventing the injection of malicious SQL elements. By separating code logic from data inputs, applications maintain integrity and protect sensitive information from unauthorized manipulation.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.
Common Consequences (5)
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Adversaries could execute system commands, typically by changing the SQL statement to redirect output to a file that can then be executed.
Confidentiality Read Application Data
Since SQL databases generally hold sensitive data, loss of confidentiality is a frequent problem with SQL injection vulnerabilities.
Authentication Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Bypass Protection Mechanism
If poor SQL commands are used to check user names and passwords or perform other kinds of authentication, it may be possible to connect to the product as another user with no previous knowledge of the password.
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
If authorization information is held in a SQL database, it may be possible to change this information through the successful exploitation of a SQL injection vulnerability.
Integrity Modify Application Data
Just as it may be possible to read sensitive information, it is also possible to modify or even delete this information with a SQL injection attack.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. For example, consider using persistence layers such as Hibernate or Enterprise Java Beans, which can provide significant protection against SQL injection if used properly.
Architecture and Design If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated. Process SQL queries using prepared statements, parameterized queries, or stored procedur…
Architecture and Design, Operation Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database ad…
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Implementation While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or whit…
Examples (2)
In 2008, a large number of web servers were compromised using the same SQL injection attack string. This single string worked against many different programs. The SQL injection was then used to modify the web sites to serve malicious code.
The following code dynamically constructs and executes a SQL query that searches for items matching a specified name. The query restricts the items displayed to those where owner matches the user name of the currently-authenticated user.
... string userName = ctx.getAuthenticatedUserName(); string query = "SELECT * FROM items WHERE owner = '" + userName + "' AND itemname = '" + ItemName.Text + "'"; sda = new SqlDataAdapter(query, conn); DataTable dt = new DataTable(); sda.Fill(dt); ...
Bad · C#
SELECT * FROM items WHERE owner = <userName> AND itemname = <itemName>;
Informative
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2023-44481 Leave Management System Project v1.0 - Multiple Authenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Leave Management System Project 8.8 High 2023-12-21
CVE-2023-45121 Online Examination System v1.0 - Multiple Authenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Online Examination System 8.8 High 2023-12-21
CVE-2023-45120 Online Examination System v1.0 - Multiple Authenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Online Examination System 8.8 High 2023-12-21
CVE-2023-45119 Online Examination System v1.0 - Multiple Authenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Online Examination System 8.8 High 2023-12-21
CVE-2023-45118 Online Examination System v1.0 - Multiple Authenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Online Examination System 8.8 High 2023-12-21
CVE-2023-45117 Online Examination System v1.0 - Multiple Authenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Online Examination System 8.8 High 2023-12-21
CVE-2023-45116 Online Examination System v1.0 - Multiple Authenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Online Examination System 8.8 High 2023-12-21
CVE-2023-45115 Online Examination System v1.0 - Multiple Authenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Online Examination System 8.8 High 2023-12-21
CVE-2023-6145 SQLi in Softomi E-commerce Software — Softomi Advanced C2C Marketplace Software 9.8 Critical 2023-12-21
CVE-2023-7023 Tongda OA 2017 delete.php sql injection — OA 2017 6.3 Medium 2023-12-21
CVE-2023-7022 Tongda OA 2017 delete_all.php sql injection — OA 2017 6.3 Medium 2023-12-21
CVE-2023-7021 Tongda OA 2017 delete_search.php sql injection — OA 2017 6.3 Medium 2023-12-21
CVE-2023-7020 Tongda OA 2017 view.php sql injection — OA 2017 6.3 Medium 2023-12-21
CVE-2023-48434 Online Voting System Project v1.0 - Multiple Unauthenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Online Voting System Project 9.8 Critical 2023-12-20
CVE-2023-48433 Online Voting System Project v1.0 - Multiple Unauthenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Online Voting System Project 9.8 Critical 2023-12-20
CVE-2023-49752 WordPress Adifier System Plugin < 3.1.4 is vulnerable to SQL Injection — Adifier - Classified Ads WordPress Theme 9.3 Critical 2023-12-20
CVE-2023-49166 WordPress MSync Plugin <= 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection — MSync 7.6 High 2023-12-20
CVE-2023-49161 WordPress Bravo Translate Plugin <= 1.2 is vulnerable to SQL Injection — Bravo Translate 7.6 High 2023-12-20
CVE-2023-26525 WordPress Dokan Plugin <= 3.7.12 is vulnerable to SQL Injection — Dokan – Best WooCommerce Multivendor Marketplace Solution – Build Your Own Amazon, eBay, Etsy 7.1 High 2023-12-20
CVE-2023-28491 WordPress Slideshow Gallery Plugin <= 1.7.6 is vulnerable to SQL Injection — Slideshow Gallery LITE 6.7 Medium 2023-12-20
CVE-2023-28788 WordPress Advanced Page Visit Counter Plugin <= 6.4.2 is vulnerable to SQL Injection — Advanced Page Visit Counter – Most Wanted Analytics Plugin for WordPress 7.1 High 2023-12-20
CVE-2023-29096 WordPress Contact Form to DB by BestWebSoft Plugin <= 1.7.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection — Contact Form to DB by BestWebSoft – Messages Database Plugin For WordPress 8.5 High 2023-12-20
CVE-2023-29432 WordPress Houzez Theme < 2.8.3 is vulnerable to SQL Injection — Houzez - Real Estate WordPress Theme 8.2 High 2023-12-20
CVE-2023-30495 WordPress Ultimate Addons for Contact Form 7 Plugin <= 3.1.23 is vulnerable to SQL Injection — Ultimate Addons for Contact Form 7 8.5 High 2023-12-20
CVE-2023-30750 WordPress CM Pop-Up banners Plugin <= 1.5.10 is vulnerable to SQL Injection — CM Popup Plugin for WordPress 8.5 High 2023-12-20
CVE-2023-30872 WordPress BSK Forms Blacklist Plugin <= 3.6.2 is vulnerable to SQL Injection — BSK Forms Blacklist 7.6 High 2023-12-20
CVE-2023-31092 WordPress Easy Bet Plugin <= 1.0.2 is vulnerable to SQL Injection — Easy Bet 5.5 Medium 2023-12-20
CVE-2023-32128 WordPress Cryptocurrency Donation Box – Bitcoin & Crypto Donations Plugin <= 2.2.7 is vulnerable to SQL Injection — Cryptocurrency Payment & Donation Box – Accept Payments in any Cryptocurrency on your WP Site for Free 5.5 Medium 2023-12-20
CVE-2023-5007 Student Information System v1.0 - Multiple Authenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Student Information System 8.8 High 2023-12-20
CVE-2023-5011 Student Information System v1.0 - Multiple Authenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Student Information System 8.8 High 2023-12-20

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-89 (SQL命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(SQL注入)) represent 10255 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.