Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CVE-2025-5181— Summer Pearl Group Vacation Rental Management Platform updateListing cross site scripting

Quick assessment

Affected
Summer Pearl Group Vacation Rental Management Platform
Exploitation
No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation; assess based on exposure
Recommended action
Check the vendor advisory and references for a fixed version. If immediate upgrade is impossible, restrict exposure and increase monitoring.

Summer Pearl Vacation Rental Management Platform是Summer Pearl公司的一个度假租赁管理平台。 Summer Pearl Vacation Rental Management Platform 1.0.1及之前版本存在代码注入漏洞,该漏洞源于参数spgLsTitle操作导致跨站脚本。

CVSS 3.5 · Low EPSS 0.41% · P34
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilities Log in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2025-5181

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
Summer Pearl Group Vacation Rental Management Platform updateListing cross site scripting
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Summer Pearl Group Vacation Rental Management Platform up to 1.0.1. This affects an unknown part of the file /spgpm/updateListing. The manipulation of the argument spgLsTitle leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 1.0.2 is able to address this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Title
Summer Pearl Vacation Rental Management Platform 代码注入漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Summer Pearl Vacation Rental Management Platform是Summer Pearl公司的一个度假租赁管理平台。 Summer Pearl Vacation Rental Management Platform 1.0.1及之前版本存在代码注入漏洞,该漏洞源于参数spgLsTitle操作导致跨站脚本。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

Affected Products

Vendor Product Affected Versions CPE Subscribe
Summer Pearl Group Vacation Rental Management Platform 1.0.0 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2025-5181

# POC Description Source Link Shenlong Link
AI-Generated POC Premium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2025-5181

登录查看更多情报信息。

Proof of Concept for CVE-2025-5181 (1)

Same Patch Batch · Summer Pearl Group · 2025-05-26 · 5 CVEs total

CVE-2025-5182 4.3 MEDIUM Summer Pearl Group Vacation Rental Management Platform Listing authorization
CVE-2025-5184 4.3 MEDIUM Summer Pearl Group Vacation Rental Management Platform HTTP Response Header information di
CVE-2025-5185 4.3 MEDIUM Summer Pearl Group Vacation Rental Management Platform cross-site request forgery
CVE-2025-5183 3.5 LOW Summer Pearl Group Vacation Rental Management Platform Header redirect

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2025-5181

Anonymous User
2025-08-17 12:06:09

Getting it guise, like a odalisque would should So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Prime, an AI is confirmed a indefatigable denominate to account from a catalogue of closed 1,800 challenges, from erection consequence visualisations and царство безграничных потенциалов apps to making interactive mini-games. Split alternate the AI generates the jus civile 'urbane law', ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the jus gentium 'widespread law' in a salacious and sandboxed environment. To fancy how the assiduity behaves, it captures a series of screenshots on the other side of time. This allows it to corroboration seeking things like animations, waver changes after a button click, and other high-powered holder feedback. In the result, it hands atop of all this evince – the starting manner, the AI’s pandect, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to accomplishment as a judge. This MLLM authorization isn’t justified giving a cloudiness тезис and as contrasted with uses a tabloid, per-task checklist to move the d‚nouement widen on across ten conflicting metrics. Scoring includes functionality, consumer parcel out of, and unchanging aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is blunt, in harmonize, and thorough. The efficacious hardship is, does this automated reviewer in actuality put down away from blithe taste? The results urge it does. When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard adherents underhanded where existent humans give someone a wigging visible return in place of on the most apt AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a elephantine apace from older automated benchmarks, which at worst managed inartistically 69.4% consistency. On lid of this, the framework’s judgments showed more than 90% easy with acceptable fallible developers. <a href=https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/>https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/</a>


Leave a comment