在 Froxlor 2.3.13 版本之前, 和 API 命令的 JSON 响应中会原样返回 列,该列存储的是原始的 PEM 格式 TLS 私钥内容。这是因为底层查询 的结果直接通过 方法返回,未进行任何字段过滤或白名单限制。具有低权限的认证 API 调用者可以获取其所属域名的证书私钥,包括由 Froxlor 在服务器端生成并以 root 权限(权限设置为 0600)存储的 Let's Encrypt 私钥,而普通用户通常无法直接访问文件系统获取这些文件;此外,拥有 reseller 权限或具有 权限的管理员账户可
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-100717 | 9.9 CRITICAL | froxlor before 2.3.12 CRLF Injection via validateUrl userinfo |
| CVE-2026-100716 | 9.9 CRITICAL | Froxlor before 2.3.12 Privilege Escalation via Symlink |
| CVE-2026-100715 | 9.6 CRITICAL | Froxlor before 2.3.12 Arbitrary File Deletion via Symlink |
| CVE-2026-100714 | 9.1 CRITICAL | Froxlor before 2.3.12 Command Injection via letsencryptchallengepath |
| CVE-2026-100720 | 8.7 HIGH | Froxlor before 2.3.12 Stored XSS via SSL certificate issuer |
| CVE-2026-100713 | 7.8 HIGH | Froxlor before 2.3.12 Privilege Escalation via SSH Key Sync |
| CVE-2026-100711 | 7.5 HIGH | froxlor before 2.3.12 Authentication Bypass via Session Persistence |
| CVE-2026-100709 | 7.5 HIGH | Froxlor before 2.3.12 2FA Bypass via Namespace Confusion |
| CVE-2026-100718 | 7.1 HIGH | Froxlor before 2.3.12 Authentication Bypass via EmailSender.add |
| CVE-2026-100712 | 6.5 MEDIUM | froxlor before 2.3.12 Two-Factor Authentication Bypass via CSRF |
| CVE-2026-100719 | 6.5 MEDIUM | Froxlor before 2.3.12 Credential Disclosure via DirProtections API |
| CVE-2026-100710 | 4.9 MEDIUM | Froxlor before 2.3.12 DKIM Private Key Disclosure via API |
No comments yet