在 SSSD 中发现了一个缺陷。在启用信任的身份管理环境中,SSSD 在评估基于主机的访问控制(HBAC)规则时,会剥离域名限定符,仅比较短用户名。如果受信任域中的经过身份验证的用户与某个已授权的本地账户具有相同的用户名,则可以绕过访问策略,从而获得对受保护服务或主机的未授权访问。
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | any |
affected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | any |
unknown |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | any |
affected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | any |
affected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | any |
affected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | any |
affected |
any |
affected |
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| Vendor | Product | Affected Versions | CPE | Subscribe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | - |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | - |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | - |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | - |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | - |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | - |
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4 | - |
cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4
|
|
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-106062 | 7.8 HIGH | Gimp: gimp: heap buffer overflow in dds loader on crafted directdraw surface file |
| CVE-2026-101258 | 7.8 HIGH | Ghostscript: ghostscript: -dsafer sandbox bypass via type 5 shading oob write and procedur |
| CVE-2026-83550 | 7.1 HIGH | Postgres-exporter: net/http/pprof exposed on metrics listener |
| CVE-2026-92821 | 6.8 MEDIUM | Sssd: sssd: access control bypass via premature ldap access rule evaluation |
| CVE-2026-106063 | 6.3 MEDIUM | Gimp: gimp: heap buffer overflow in dicom export on oversized image dimensions |
| CVE-2026-104046 | 6.2 MEDIUM | Sssd: sssd: denial of service via incomplete identity provider authentication requests |
| CVE-2026-104044 | 6.2 MEDIUM | Sssd: sssd: denial of service via crafted passkey kerberos authentication request |
| CVE-2026-104038 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Sssd: sssd: denial of service via missing sid extension in certificate mapping |
| CVE-2026-104036 | 5.8 MEDIUM | Sssd: sssd: denial of service via out-of-bounds write in nfs idmap plugin |
| CVE-2026-104031 | 5.5 MEDIUM | Sssd: sssd: denial of service via memory exhaustion in autofs responder |
| CVE-2026-104032 | 5.5 MEDIUM | Sssd: sssd: denial of service via unprivileged autofs cache invalidation |
| CVE-2026-104035 | 5.5 MEDIUM | Sssd: sssd: denial of service via memory exhaustion in kcm responder |
| CVE-2026-104037 | 5.5 MEDIUM | Sssd: sssd: denial of service via packet length underflow in autofs responder |
| CVE-2026-104041 | 5.5 MEDIUM | Sssd: sssd: denial of service via unbounded negative cache growth |
| CVE-2026-104042 | 5.5 MEDIUM | Sssd: sssd: denial of service via out-of-bounds read in pam responder |
| CVE-2026-104043 | 5.5 MEDIUM | Sssd: sssd: denial of service via undersized packet parsing in nss responder |
| CVE-2026-105305 | 5.4 MEDIUM | Keycloak-services: keycloak-services: device authorization grant bypasses per-client minim |
| CVE-2026-106033 | 5.4 MEDIUM | Ansible: ansible-ui: ansible ui dom xss in /redirect next parameter |
| CVE-2026-104033 | 5.4 MEDIUM | Sssd: sssd: access control bypass via improper ldap shadow expiration check |
| CVE-2026-104047 | 5.3 MEDIUM | Sssd: sssd: information disclosure via query injection in entra id lookups |
Showing top 20 of 26 CVEs. View all on vendor page → →
No comments yet