目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1359 元

100%

CVE-2026-105942— Apache Pulsar 代理请求权限提升漏洞

一分钟漏洞结论

影响对象
Apache Software Foundation Apache Pulsar
利用判断
尚无明确在野利用证据,仍需结合暴露面评估
建议动作
优先检查厂商安全公告和参考链接中的修复版本;无法立即升级时,限制受影响服务暴露并加强监测。

当已配置的代理角色代表其他用户(即原始主体)向代理服务器(broker)发送请求时,代理服务器的设计逻辑是:必须同时验证代理角色和原始主体的权限,仅当两者均被授权时才允许该请求,从而确保原始主体无法超越其自身权限。然而,两个漏洞削弱了这一检查机制。 第一个漏洞:原始主体的权限验证错误地使用了代理角色的认证数据,而非其自身的认证数据。在代理服务器的管理 REST API 和 Functions Worker 功能中,所有代理请求均受此影响。在 Pulsar 二进制协议中,当代理未将客户端凭证转发给代理服务器时(这是受

CVSS 7.7 · High

影响版本矩阵 2

厂商产品 版本范围状态
Apache Software Foundation Apache Pulsar 2.8.1< 4.0.14 affected
4.1.0< 4.2.5 affected
获取后续新漏洞提醒 登录后订阅

一、 漏洞 CVE-2026-105942 基础信息

漏洞信息

对漏洞内容有疑问?看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助!
查看神龙十问 ↗

尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术,但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性,但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。

Vulnerability Title
Apache Pulsar: Original principal of proxied requests authorized with the proxy's authentication data, allowing privilege escalation
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
When a configured proxy role sends a request to the broker on behalf of another user (the original principal), the broker is designed to authorize both the proxy role and the original principal and to allow the request only if both are authorized, so that the original principal cannot exceed its own permissions. Two flaws weakened this check. First, the original principal was authorized with the proxy's authentication data instead of its own. On the admin REST API of the broker and the functions worker, this applied to every proxied request. On the Pulsar binary protocol, it applied when the proxy did not forward the client's credentials to the broker, which was the default of the Pulsar proxy in the affected versions. Authorization providers that resolve permissions from the role name only, such as the default authorization provider, are not affected by this flaw. The multi-role token authorization provider (MultiRolesTokenAuthorizationProvider), added in Apache Pulsar 2.8.1, resolves roles from the role claim of the token in the authentication data it is given. When a proxy authenticates to the broker with its own token, the original principal was therefore authorized with all roles in the proxy's token. If any of those roles is a superuser or tenant admin role, any user whose requests are forwarded by that proxy can perform operations that need those permissions without holding them. Custom authorization providers that use the authentication data could be affected in a similar way. Second, independently of the authorization provider, the tenant admin check of a proxied admin REST API request succeeded without checking the original principal when the proxy role was itself an admin role of the tenant. In deployments where a proxy role is a tenant admin, including with the default authorization provider, any user whose requests are forwarded by that proxy could perform tenant administration operations on that tenant. This behavior is present from 2.8.4 in the 2.8.x releases, from 2.9.3 in the 2.9.x releases, and from 2.10.1 onwards. Deployments that use neither the multi-role token authorization provider nor a custom provider that uses the authentication data are not affected by the first flaw, and with the multi-role token authorization provider, neither are deployments whose proxies do not authenticate to the broker with a token. Deployments in which no proxy role is listed as an admin role of a tenant are not affected by the second flaw. A proxy role that is a superuser but is not listed as a tenant admin does not trigger it, because the tenant admin check of the built-in authorization providers only considers the tenant's admin roles; this can differ for custom authorization providers that treat superusers as tenant admins. In fixed versions, both the proxy role and the original principal are authorized for each proxied request, and the original principal is authorized only with its own authentication data. With the multi-role token authorization provider, the roles of a forwarded token are used for the original principal only when that token authenticates as the original principal; otherwise only the original principal's role name is used. For tenant admin checks, the proxy role and the original principal must each be a superuser or a tenant admin of the tenant. This issue affects Apache Pulsar versions from 2.8.1 before 4.0.14 and from 4.1.0 before 4.2.5. - 4.0.x version users should upgrade to at least 4.0.14. - 4.1.x and 4.2.x version users should upgrade to at least 4.2.5. Users operating versions prior to those listed above should upgrade to the aforementioned patched versions or newer versions. The currently supported Apache Pulsar release lines are 4.0.x and 5.0.x. The supported versions schedule is available at https://pulsar.apache.org/contribute/release-policy/.
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
授权机制不正确
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5

受影响产品

厂商 产品 影响版本 CPE 订阅
Apache Software Foundation Apache Pulsar 2.8.1 ~ 4.0.14 -

二、漏洞 CVE-2026-105942 的公开POC

# POC 描述 源链接 神龙链接
AI 生成 POC 高级

未找到公开 POC。

登录以生成 AI POC

三、漏洞 CVE-2026-105942 的情报信息

请登录查看更多情报信息。

CVE-2026-105942 其他参考 (2)

同批安全公告 · Apache Software Foundation · 2026-10-21 · 共 69 条

CVE-2026-105944 10.0 CRITICAL Apache Pulsar Manager 认证绕过及凭证泄露漏洞
CVE-2026-111812 10.0 CRITICAL Apache Traffic Server 远程代码执行漏洞
CVE-2026-111813 10.0 CRITICAL Apache Traffic Server magick 插件远程代码执行漏洞
CVE-2026-111815 10.0 CRITICAL Apache Traffic Server TLS 会话恢复绕过 SNI 验证漏洞
CVE-2026-111814 10.0 CRITICAL Apache Traffic Server mTLS 身份混淆漏洞
CVE-2026-111809 9.3 CRITICAL Apache Traffic Server 请求走私漏洞
CVE-2026-111816 9.3 CRITICAL Apache Traffic Server 302 响应绕过解析漏洞
CVE-2026-105869 9.2 CRITICAL Apache Pulsar 未验证令牌角色认证绕过漏洞
CVE-2026-111811 9.0 CRITICAL Apache Traffic Server tsmemcache 插件未认证缓存漏洞
CVE-2025-31699 8.9 HIGH Apache Traffic Server 请求走私漏洞
CVE-2025-55702 8.7 HIGH Apache Traffic Server 请求解析漏洞
CVE-2026-105937 8.7 HIGH Apache Pulsar 影子主题源授权缺失漏洞
CVE-2026-111808 8.6 HIGH Apache Traffic Server HTTP/2 资源耗尽漏洞
CVE-2026-111805 8.6 HIGH Apache Traffic Server HTTP/2 后端工作池耗尽漏洞
CVE-2026-111804 8.2 HIGH Apache Traffic Server wasm 插件释放后使用漏洞
CVE-2026-105945 7.7 HIGH Apache Pulsar 文件存储跨租户包访问漏洞
CVE-2026-111810 7.5 HIGH Apache Traffic Server 未限流日志导致拒绝服务漏洞
CVE-2026-105934 7.2 HIGH Apache Pulsar 截断分区主题租户管理授权绕过漏洞
CVE-2026-105930 6.0 MEDIUM Apache Pulsar 函数包 URL 跨租户下载漏洞
CVE-2026-112381 5.9 MEDIUM Apache Traffic Server 空指针解引用漏洞

显示前 20 条,共 69 条。 查看全部 &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-105942

暂无评论


发表评论