目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1359 元

100%

CVE-2026-110018— aBlocks 2.17.0 认证权限提升至 roleSlug 属性漏洞

一分钟漏洞结论

影响对象
kodezen aBlocks – Gutenberg Blocks, User Dashboard Builder, Popup Builder, Form Builder & Animation Builder
利用判断
尚无明确在野利用证据,仍需结合暴露面评估
建议动作
优先检查厂商安全公告和参考链接中的修复版本;无法立即升级时,限制受影响服务暴露并加强监测。

WordPress 插件"aBlocks – Gutenberg Blocks, User Dashboard Builder, Popup Builder, Form Builder & Animation Builder"在所有版本(包括 2.17.0 及更早版本)中存在权限提升漏洞。该漏洞源于 这个 REST API 端点被注册时使用了 ,导致权限校验被完全绕过。此外, 处理函数直接从攻击者可控制的 中的区块属性读取 ,却从未验证该区块的 是否为 。而 方法仅在保存时执行此项验证。因此,拥有 Contribu

CVSS 8.8 · High

影响版本矩阵 1

获取后续新漏洞提醒 登录后订阅

一、 漏洞 CVE-2026-110018 基础信息

漏洞信息

对漏洞内容有疑问?看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助!
查看神龙十问 ↗

尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术,但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性,但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。

Vulnerability Title
aBlocks <= 2.17.0 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Privilege Escalation to 'roleSlug' Block Attribute
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
The aBlocks – Gutenberg Blocks, User Dashboard Builder, Popup Builder, Form Builder & Animation Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 2.17.0 via the `/ablocks/v1/form-builder/registration` REST endpoint. The vulnerability exists because the endpoint is registered with `permission_callback => __return_true` and the `register()` handler reads `roleSlug` directly from attacker-controlled block attributes in `post_content` without ever verifying that the block's `formType` is `registration` — a condition that `RegistrationFormSanitizer::verify()` imposes only at save-time, meaning a Contributor can preserve an arbitrary `roleSlug` by saving a block with `formType='login'` and then triggering the endpoint via a valid `wp_rest` nonce and post-ownership check. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to escalate their WordPress role to Editor or any other non-administrator role and receive a fully authenticated session at the elevated privilege level via `WP_User::set_role()` and `wp_set_auth_cookie()`. Escalation is bounded below administrator-tier roles because `is_safe_registration_role()` rejects any role holding `manage_options`, `edit_users`, `delete_users`, `create_users`, `promote_users`, or `edit_theme_options`, meaning the highest practically reachable role on a standard WordPress installation is Editor.
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
特权管理不恰当
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5

受影响产品

二、漏洞 CVE-2026-110018 的公开POC

# POC 描述 源链接 神龙链接
AI 生成 POC 高级

未找到公开 POC。

登录以生成 AI POC

三、漏洞 CVE-2026-110018 的情报信息

请登录查看更多情报信息。

CVE-2026-110018 厂商页面 (3)

CVE-2026-110018 其他参考 (3)

IV. Related Vulnerabilities