MISP 在处理模块插件设置时存在漏洞。当服务器为 API 调用重新构建模块提供的设置时,会丢弃模块在其自身配置元数据中声明的 (脱敏)和 (仅限命令行)标志。 由此导致以下后果: 若模块将某个设置(例如 API 密钥)标记为 ,该设置的值仍会通过 和 接口以完整形式返回,从而将敏感凭据暴露给任何有权读取服务器设置的已认证用户。 若模块将某个设置标记为 (本意是仅允许通过命令行界面修改),该设置仍可通过 Web API 进行修改,从而绕过原本设定的访问限制。 因此,任何拥有服务器设置访问权限的已认证用户,均可读取敏
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-112178 | 7.1 HIGH | MISP Proposal ACL Bypass: Incomplete Distribution Level Check in Shadow Attribute Access C |
| CVE-2026-112188 | 7.1 HIGH | MISP Server Settings Lookup Exposes Sensitive Configuration Data via Branch Name Resolutio |
| CVE-2026-112179 | 5.3 MEDIUM | MISP Event Synchronization Exposes Non-Exportable Tags on Remote Instances |
| CVE-2026-112180 | 5.1 MEDIUM | MISP Incomplete Event Deletion Leaves Orphaned Sensitive Records |
| CVE-2026-112184 | 4.8 MEDIUM | MISP Workflow Module: Reflected XSS via Unescaped misp-modules Parameter Names in Form Lab |
| CVE-2026-112183 | 4.8 MEDIUM | MISP CSS Injection via Remote Tag Colour in Event Preview |
No comments yet