以下是对该漏洞描述的中文翻译: 通过 Apache 代理暴露的 Dogtag CA REST 端点( ,由 IdM 提供)在未进行身份验证的情况下,针对格式错误的请求返回 HTTP 500 错误,并泄露内部 Java 堆栈跟踪。该未经身份验证的错误处理路径还会将大量多行堆栈跟踪写入 CA 调试日志,从而形成一种“日志放大”资源耗尽攻击向量(导致磁盘增长和 I/O 竞争),且整个过程无需身份验证。
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| Vendor | Product | Affected Versions | CPE | Subscribe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Certificate System 9 | - |
cpe:/a:redhat:certificate_system:9
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | - |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | - |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | - |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | - |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | - |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9
|
|
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-84268 | 8.8 HIGH | Gvfs: sftp: heap-based buffer overflow in read_reply() |
| CVE-2026-84218 | 8.1 HIGH | Org.jolokia/jolokia-core: incomplete jndi denylist in jolokia jsr-160 proxy (bypass of cve |
| CVE-2026-49329 | 7.5 HIGH | Openshift/oauth-server: openshift/oauth-server: quadratic-time dos via accept-language hea |
| CVE-2026-84233 | 7.0 HIGH | Rpm: command execution via macro expansion in `rpmuncompress -x` for crafted `.gem` filena |
| CVE-2026-84269 | 6.5 MEDIUM | Gvfs: afp: heap-based buffer overflow in dsi read path |
| CVE-2026-84232 | 5.4 MEDIUM | Pulpcore: python-pulpcore: stored cross-site scripting via inline rendering of uploaded ht |
| CVE-2026-53682 | 5.3 MEDIUM | Pki-core: dogtag-pki: unauthenticated dogtag ca rest api exposes security domain hosts |
| CVE-2026-84270 | 4.3 MEDIUM | Gvfs: mtp: out-of-bounds read in do_read() |
| CVE-2026-84267 | 4.3 MEDIUM | Gvfs: sftp: uninitialized heap disclosure in read_string() |
No comments yet