Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CVE-2026-50243— 'response-ip'/'rpz' can rewrite BOGUS answers instead of returning SERVFAIL

Quick assessment

Affected
NLnet Labs Unbound
Exploitation
No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation; assess based on exposure
Recommended action
Check the vendor advisory and references for a fixed version. If immediate upgrade is impossible, restrict exposure and increase monitoring.

NLnet Labs Unbound是荷兰NLnet Labs组织的域名系统解析服务器。 NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.2版本及之前版本至1.25.1版本存在信任管理问题漏洞,该漏洞源于'respip'模块中的重写处理器未检查上游应答的安全状态,可能将BOGUS A/AAAA应答重写为操作员配置的IP,导致客户端收到不安全的NOERROR回复,恶意行为者可通过伪造落入操作员配置子网的BOGUS A/AAAA应答利用此投毒效果。

AI Predicted 7.5 Difficulty: Easy EPSS 0.13% · P2

Affected Version Matrix 1

VendorProduct Version RangeStatus
NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.2< 1.25.2 affected
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilities Log in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2026-50243

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
'response-ip'/'rpz' can rewrite BOGUS answers instead of returning SERVFAIL
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.2 up to and including 1.25.1, when Unbound is configured with the 'respip' module in front of the validator together with a 'response-ip' redirect rule or an RPZ file with an RPZ-IP trigger, the rewriting handler does not check the security status of the upstream answer and can instead rewrite a BOGUS A/AAAA answer to point to an operator's configured IP. If the validator finds an expired or otherwise invalid RRSIG on an answer whose A record falls within a 'response-ip'/RPZ configuration, the answer is still rewritten and given a hard coded security level of INSECURE. This results in the client receiving an INSECURE NOERROR reply rewritten by the operator's configured IP. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by spoofing a BOGUS A/AAAA answer that falls inside the operator's configured subnet rewrites. Such DNSSEC protected answers are then insecurely redirected to the operator's configured target.
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
使用不可信的源
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Title
NLnet Labs Unbound 信任管理问题漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
NLnet Labs Unbound是荷兰NLnet Labs组织的域名系统解析服务器。 NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.2版本及之前版本至1.25.1版本存在信任管理问题漏洞,该漏洞源于'respip'模块中的重写处理器未检查上游应答的安全状态,可能将BOGUS A/AAAA应答重写为操作员配置的IP,导致客户端收到不安全的NOERROR回复,恶意行为者可通过伪造落入操作员配置子网的BOGUS A/AAAA应答利用此投毒效果。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

Shenlong Deep Dive — AI Deep Analysis

10-question deep dive: root cause, exploitation, mitigation, urgency. Read summary free, full version requires login.

Affected Products

Vendor Product Affected Versions CPE Subscribe
NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.2 ~ 1.25.2 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2026-50243

# POC Description Source Link Shenlong Link
AI-Generated POC Premium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2026-50243

请登录查看更多情报信息。

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-50243 (1)

Same Patch Batch · NLnet Labs · 2026-07-22 · 24 CVEs total

CVE-2026-55973 7.5 HIGH 'dns-error-reporting: yes' leads to stack buffer overflow
CVE-2026-32665 7.5 HIGH Remote DNS-over-QUIC denial of service due to `quic-size` budget bypass
CVE-2026-40691 7.5 HIGH Packet of death for DNSCrypt over TCP
CVE-2026-44690 7.5 HIGH Cross-zone wildcard cache poisoning via RRSIG.labels manipulation
CVE-2026-50248 6.5 MEDIUM BOGUS configured primary hostname accepted for XFR in auth/rpz zones
CVE-2026-55991 5.9 MEDIUM Remote DNS-over-QUIC (DoQ) flow-control assertion failure in libngtcp2
CVE-2026-14586 5.9 MEDIUM Assertion in libngtcp2 when under pressure in high concurrency DNS-over-QUIC environments
CVE-2026-56444 5.9 MEDIUM Degradation of resolution service when 'discard-timeout' and 'serve-expired-client-timeout
CVE-2026-44621 5.9 MEDIUM Libunbound applications configured with 'unwanted-reply-threshold' could eventually be abr
CVE-2026-55990 5.9 MEDIUM Packet of death for a DNSCrypt misconfigured Unbound
CVE-2026-50046 5.9 MEDIUM Possible heap use-after-free in an error path when a DoT forwarded query is jostled out
CVE-2026-55717 5.9 MEDIUM 'serve-expired-client-timeout' and 'response-ip' CNAME redirect could lead to a crash
CVE-2026-52863 5.9 MEDIUM Memory corruption could lead to crash and denial of service
CVE-2026-50045 5.3 MEDIUM 'max-global-quota' reset by DNSSEC validation restarts
CVE-2026-50251 5.3 MEDIUM Attacker supplied '0.0.0.0'/'::' glue triggers defensive full-cache flush
CVE-2026-56416 4.8 MEDIUM Possible heap buffer overflow when validator canonicalizes RDATA that contains domain name
CVE-2026-46582 3.7 LOW A wildcard replay, as another piece of data, triggers poisoning in the serve expired reply
CVE-2026-44687 3.7 LOW Off-by-one error in 'harden-below-nxdomain' logic can shadow a stub/forward zone by a legi
CVE-2026-41637 3.7 LOW Degradation of resolution service from improperly accounted client-terminated DNS-over-QUI
CVE-2026-54478 3.7 LOW DNS Cookie bypass when combined with proxy-protocol use

Showing top 20 of 24 CVEs. View all on vendor page &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-50243

No comments yet


Leave a comment