目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标！

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1359 元

100%
请我们喝杯咖啡

CVE-2026-54875— Non-Constant-Time SM2 Scalar Multiplication on ARM64 and RISC-V

一分钟漏洞结论

影响对象
OpenSSL OpenSSL
利用判断
尚无明确在野利用证据，仍需结合暴露面评估
建议动作
优先检查厂商安全公告和参考链接中的修复版本；无法立即升级时，限制受影响服务暴露并加强监测。

Issue summary: A non-constant-time optimized implementation of scalar point multiplication is used for SM2 private key operations on ARM64 and RISC-V platforms. Impact summary: An attacker able to measure the time taken by, or to observe the cache-line access

获取后续新漏洞提醒 登录后订阅

一、 漏洞 CVE-2026-54875 基础信息

漏洞信息

Shenlong is analyzing...

对漏洞内容有疑问？看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助！
查看神龙十问 ↗

尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术，但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性，但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。

Vulnerability Title
Non-Constant-Time SM2 Scalar Multiplication on ARM64 and RISC-V
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
Issue summary: A non-constant-time optimized implementation of scalar point multiplication is used for SM2 private key operations on ARM64 and RISC-V platforms. Impact summary: An attacker able to measure the time taken by, or to observe the cache-line access pattern of SM2 signing or decryption on an affected platform can learn information about the secret scalar. CWE: CWE-208: Observable Timing Discrepancy Description: On ARM64 and RISC-V processors, the SM2 curve uses an optimized scalar multiplication implementation whose conditional branches and table look ups are chosen according to the bits of the secret scalar. The execution time and the cache-access pattern therefore depend on the long-term private key (during SM2 decryption) or the per-signature nonce (during SM2 signature generation), forming a timing and cache side-channel. FIPS Impact: no SM2 is not a FIPS algorithm and the optimized SM2 implementation is not part of the FIPS module. OpenSSL 4.0, 3.6, 3.5 and 3.4 are vulnerable to this issue on AArch64 and RISC-V. OpenSSL 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue. OpenSSL 4.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 4.0.3. OpenSSL 3.6 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.6.5. OpenSSL 3.5 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.5.9. OpenSSL 3.4 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.4.8. This issue was reported on 2 May 2026 by Abhinav Agarwal. It was independently reported on 6 June 2026 by Feng Xue. The fix was developed by Igor Ustinov. -- cut (non-publishing metadata for internal use) -- Reported by: Abhinav Agarwal, Feng Xue Fixed by: Igor Ustinov
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
通过时间差异性导致的信息暴露
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5

受影响产品

厂商 产品 影响版本 CPE 订阅
OpenSSL OpenSSL 4.0.0 ~ 4.0.3 -

二、漏洞 CVE-2026-54875 的公开POC

# POC 描述 源链接 神龙链接
AI 生成 POC 高级

未找到公开 POC。

登录以生成 AI POC

三、漏洞 CVE-2026-54875 的情报信息

请登录查看更多情报信息。

CVE-2026-54875 其他参考 (5)

同批安全公告 · OpenSSL · 2026-09-29 · 共 14 条

CVE-2026-35189 Excessive Memory Allocation in Relative CRLDP Processing
CVE-2026-35191 QUIC Unvalidated Amplification Credit may be Over Accounted
CVE-2026-75806 Unauthenticated and Undersized DTLS 1.2 AEAD Record Causes DoS
CVE-2026-75804 QUIC Connection-Level Flow Control is Not Enforced for Streams
CVE-2026-75805 NULL Pointer Dereference in CMP Client Revocation Response Handling
CVE-2026-42772 Potential CPU DoS via O(n^2) Fragment Reassembly in QUIC
CVE-2026-54873 QUIC STREAM Fragment Metadata DoS
CVE-2026-54872 Timing Side-Channel in Scalar Multiplication for Non-NIST EC Curves
CVE-2026-77696 Timing Side-Channel in SM2 Signature Generation
CVE-2026-72897 Out-of-Bounds Access After SSL_set_SSL_CTX() During a Handshake
CVE-2026-84782 DTLS Retransmits Handshake Messages From a Stale Buffer Offset
CVE-2026-84784 QUIC: Unbounded RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID Backlog
CVE-2026-84783 Use-After-Free in X.509 Extension Cache Under Concurrent Use

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

Same product: OpenSSL
Same vendor: OpenSSL
Same weakness: CWE-208

V. Comments for CVE-2026-54875

暂无评论

发表评论