目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1336

100%

CVE-2026-66908— Apache Camel platform-http-main JWT验证绕过漏洞

一分钟漏洞结论

影响对象
Apache Software Foundation Apache Camel
利用判断
尚无明确在野利用证据,仍需结合暴露面评估
建议动作
优先检查厂商安全公告和参考链接中的修复版本;无法立即升级时,限制受影响服务暴露并加强监测。

Apache Camel Platform HTTP Main 组件存在不正确的身份验证漏洞 影响版本: 此漏洞影响 Apache Camel 4.8.0 至 4.22.0(不含 4.22.0)之间的所有版本。 漏洞详情: Camel-main 嵌入式 HTTP 服务器可以通过 结合 JWT keystore(密钥库)属性配置,使用 JWT(JSON Web Token)认证来保护其端点。然而,在旧版本中,当未配置 (JWT 签发者)或 (JWT 受众)时, 方法返回 。这导致调用方完全跳过了 调用,使得 Vert

AI 预测 7.5 利用难度: 较易 EPSS 0.32% · P24

可能的 ATT&CK 技术 1 AI

T1199 · Trusted Relationship

影响版本矩阵 1

厂商产品 版本范围状态
Apache Software Foundation Apache Camel 4.8.0< 4.22.0 affected
获取后续新漏洞提醒 登录后订阅

一、 漏洞 CVE-2026-66908 基础信息

漏洞信息

对漏洞内容有疑问?看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助!
查看神龙十问 ↗

尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术,但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性,但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。

Vulnerability Title
Apache Camel: Camel-platform-http-main: when JWT authentication was configured with a keystore but no issuer or audience, the iss and aud claims were never validated, so any unexpired token signed by a trusted key was accepted
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
Improper Authentication vulnerability in Apache Camel Platform HTTP Main component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.8.0 before 4.22.0. The camel-main embedded HTTP server can protect its endpoints with JWT authentication, configured through authenticationEnabled together with the JWT keystore properties. JWTAuthenticationConfigurer.buildJwtOptions returned null when neither jwtIssuer nor jwtAudience was configured, and the caller then skipped the JWTAuthOptions.setJWTOptions call entirely, so the Vert.x JWTAuth instance was built from the keystore alone. The result was that inbound tokens were checked only for signature and expiry: the iss and aud claims were not validated at all. Nothing signalled this - the server started normally and reported no warning - so a deployment configured the documented way silently enforced less than the operator believed it had enabled, and the component documentation itself presented signature and expiry checking as the default with issuer and audience as an optional extra. Both the application server and the management server were affected, because the omission was in each of the two configureAuthentication paths. Any unexpired token signed by any key the configured keystore trusts was therefore accepted, regardless of which issuer minted it or which audience it was intended for. How far that reaches depends on the trust set of the keystore: where the signing key belongs to a shared or multi-tenant identity provider, a token legitimately issued for an entirely different audience is accepted, while a keystore holding a dedicated signer narrows it to reuse of tokens minted for other services within the same trust domain. The jwtIssuer and jwtAudience options did not exist before 4.21.0, so on earlier releases there was no supported way to have these claims enforced at all. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.22.0, which fixes the issue. From 4.22.0 the server refuses to start when a JWT keystore is configured but neither jwtIssuer nor jwtAudience is set, naming the properties involved, and a deployment that genuinely wants signature and expiry validation only must say so explicitly with the new jwtAllowMissingIssuerAndAudience option, which defaults to false. This behaviour is fixed only on 4.22.0. The 4.14.9 and 4.18.4 releases do not change the default: they add the jwtIssuer and jwtAudience options so that operators on those maintenance lines can enforce the claims by configuration, and an installation that upgrades to 4.14.9 or 4.18.4 without also setting at least one of those two properties is still accepting any unexpired token signed by a trusted key. Users on 4.14.x or 4.18.x should therefore upgrade to 4.14.9 or 4.18.4 and then set jwtIssuer, jwtAudience, or both. Releases from 4.8.0 up to and including 4.21.x offer no way to enforce these claims and should be moved to a version that does. Independently of version, restrict the JWT keystore to the smallest possible trust set - ideally a signer dedicated to this service rather than a shared identity-provider key - and where a gateway already validates issuer and audience in front of the server, ensure it cannot be bypassed. Notes: The JIRA ticket:  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24281  refers to the various commits that resolved the issue, and has more details. The fail-closed guard could not be backported. The jwtIssuer and jwtAudience options were themselves only introduced in 4.21.0 by CAMEL-23525, so on camel-4.18.x and camel-4.14.x there was nothing an operator could set to satisfy the requirement and the guard would have broken every JWT deployment on those branches with no remedy available.
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
认证机制不恰当
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5

受影响产品

厂商 产品 影响版本 CPE 订阅
Apache Software Foundation Apache Camel 4.8.0 ~ 4.22.0 -

二、漏洞 CVE-2026-66908 的公开POC

# POC 描述 源链接 神龙链接
AI 生成 POC 高级

未找到公开 POC。

登录以生成 AI POC

三、漏洞 CVE-2026-66908 的情报信息

登录查看更多情报信息。

CVE-2026-66908 厂商安全公告 (1)

同批安全公告 · Apache Software Foundation · 2026-08-24 · 共 9 条

CVE-2026-75099 Apache Allura 未授权REST信息泄露漏洞
CVE-2026-78329 Apache Camel Undertow 端点头过滤策略失效
CVE-2026-71300 Apache Camel Atmosphere WebSocket 头注入漏洞
CVE-2026-63621 Apache Camel Knative 云事件字段未过滤映射至消息头
CVE-2026-66907 Apache Camel Google Storage 消费者路径遍历漏洞
CVE-2026-66906 Apache Camel Azure-Storage-Blob目录遍历漏洞
CVE-2026-60093 Apache Camel Azure Storage DataLake 目录遍历漏洞
CVE-2026-59230 Apache Camel-Mail 远程代码执行漏洞

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-66908

暂无评论


发表评论