在 ash 项目的 库中存在一个整数溢出或回绕漏洞。攻击者可以通过提交一个包含超过 65,535 个元素的向量,破坏已存储的向量数据,导致后续对该向量的读取操作崩溃。 具体机制如下: (位于 )将向量编码为 ,后跟各元素浮点数。该实现将元素数量打包进一个 16 位字段,但未检查其取值范围。 当输入列表包含超过 65,535 个元素时,维度值会模 65,536 回绕,导致编码后的头部记录的维度与实际存储的浮点数数量不一致。 随后 根据回绕后的维度读取 个字节,因此每次读取被破坏的值时都会因解析错误而抛出异常,从而拒绝
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| Vendor | Product | Affected Versions | CPE | Subscribe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ash-project | ash | 2.14.13 ~ 3.32.2 |
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
|
| ash-project | ash | e2855843ca4a9141dcd7f40f47227e13b43f0e00 ~ cef5eb7b0693f04d1699a36e02a4e09ce1e7bffe |
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
|
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-74837 | 8.7 HIGH | Unbounded atom creation from client-supplied RPC field names in AshTypescript field format |
| CVE-2026-77856 | 8.2 HIGH | Unbounded atom creation from typed struct field names in AshTypescript field selector |
| CVE-2026-82730 | 8.2 HIGH | Authorization-redacted field values disclosed through AshTypescript result normalization |
| CVE-2026-77950 | 6.3 MEDIUM | RPC error handler fails open in AshTypescript, disclosing unredacted errors |
| CVE-2026-82732 | 6.3 MEDIUM | Declared argument constraints not enforced on AshTypescript typed controller routes |
| CVE-2026-82733 | 6.3 MEDIUM | Route handler return value echoed into AshTypescript error response |
| CVE-2026-82738 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.Type.UUIDv7 accepts non-v7 UUIDs that then fail to load, causing persistent denial of |
| CVE-2026-82735 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Match regex runs on over-length input in Ash.Type.String, enabling regex denial of service |
| CVE-2026-82747 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.Policy.Authorizer returns records denied by a runtime read policy to any actor |
| CVE-2026-82742 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.Filter.Runtime materializes a combinatorial cross-product over to-many relationships, |
| CVE-2026-82745 | 5.9 MEDIUM | ETS and Mnesia data layers overwrite an existing record on create instead of enforcing pri |
| CVE-2026-82746 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.update_many/4 atomic path skips resource policy authorization, allowing updates to for |
| CVE-2026-82749 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash relationship parent(...) filter degrades to an IS NULL match when the parent field is |
| CVE-2026-82731 | 2.3 LOW | Unescaped path parameters in AshTypescript generated TypeScript client allow request redir |
| CVE-2026-82740 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Type ignores outer array constraints on nested {:array, {:array, type}} inputs |
| CVE-2026-82739 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Resource.Validation.Confirm leaks a confirmed field's stored value in the atomic misma |
| CVE-2026-82741 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Type.Union with :map_with_tag does not force the tag on dump, enabling tag confusion |
| CVE-2026-82736 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Type.CiString validates length and match constraints before case folding, allowing con |
| CVE-2026-82734 | 2.1 LOW | Non-finite Infinity/NaN decimal values bypass bounds constraints in Ash.Type.Decimal |
| CVE-2026-82743 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Actions.Read.AsyncLimiter busy-spins a scheduler while awaiting slow async reads |
Showing top 20 of 23 CVEs. View all on vendor page → →
No comments yet