在 Ansible Automation Platform 的 automation-controller(AWX)中发现一个缺陷。 批量任务启动 API(POST /api/v2/bulk/job_launch/)在授权请求的实例组时,仅执行了“读”级别的权限检查,而标准的单任务启动路径则要求对同一字段拥有“使用”(use)级别的权限。因此,拥有实例组的“读”权限(而非“使用”权限)——例如内置的只读系统审计员(System Auditor)角色——并同时拥有某个任务模板的执行权限的主体,可以将批量任务启动到他们
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| Vendor | Product | Affected Versions | CPE | Subscribe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 | - |
cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 | - |
cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2 | - |
cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2
|
|
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-84268 | 8.8 HIGH | Gvfs: sftp: heap-based buffer overflow in read_reply() |
| CVE-2026-84218 | 8.1 HIGH | Org.jolokia/jolokia-core: incomplete jndi denylist in jolokia jsr-160 proxy (bypass of cve |
| CVE-2026-49329 | 7.5 HIGH | Openshift/oauth-server: openshift/oauth-server: quadratic-time dos via accept-language hea |
| CVE-2026-84233 | 7.0 HIGH | Rpm: command execution via macro expansion in `rpmuncompress -x` for crafted `.gem` filena |
| CVE-2026-84269 | 6.5 MEDIUM | Gvfs: afp: heap-based buffer overflow in dsi read path |
| CVE-2026-11873 | 6.5 MEDIUM | Pki-core: dogtag-pki: empty request to dogtag /ca/rest/certrequests causes http 500, java |
| CVE-2026-84232 | 5.4 MEDIUM | Pulpcore: python-pulpcore: stored cross-site scripting via inline rendering of uploaded ht |
| CVE-2026-53682 | 5.3 MEDIUM | Pki-core: dogtag-pki: unauthenticated dogtag ca rest api exposes security domain hosts |
| CVE-2026-84270 | 4.3 MEDIUM | Gvfs: mtp: out-of-bounds read in do_read() |
| CVE-2026-84267 | 4.3 MEDIUM | Gvfs: sftp: uninitialized heap disclosure in read_string() |
No comments yet