Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) — Vulnerability Class 4415

4415 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-20 represents a critical software weakness where applications fail to properly verify the integrity, format, or type of incoming data before processing it. This oversight allows attackers to inject malicious payloads, such as SQL injection strings or cross-site scripting code, which can bypass security controls and compromise system integrity. Exploitation typically occurs when untrusted data from external sources, like user forms or network packets, is treated as executable code or trusted input. To mitigate this risk, developers must implement rigorous input validation strategies, including strict type checking, length constraints, and allow-listing acceptable characters. Additionally, employing parameterized queries and output encoding ensures that even if validation fails, the injected data remains inert, thereby preserving application security and preventing unauthorized execution or data exposure.

MITRE CWE Description
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Input validation is a frequently-used technique for checking potentially dangerous inputs in order to ensure that the inputs are safe for processing within the code, or when communicating with other components. Input can consist of: raw data - strings, numbers, parameters, file contents, etc. metadata - information about the raw data, such as headers or size Data can be simple or structured. Structured data can be composed of many nested layers, composed of combinations of metadata and raw data, with other simple or structured data. Many properties of raw data or metadata may need to be validated upon entry into the code, such as: specified quantities such as size, length, frequency, price, rate, number of operations, time, etc. implied or derived quantities, such as the actual size of a file instead of a specified size indexes, offsets, or positions into more complex data structures symbolic keys or other elements into hash tables, associative arrays, etc. well-formedness, i.e. syntactic correctness - compliance with expected syntax lexical token correctness - compliance with rules for what is treated as a token specified or derived type - the actual type of the input (or what the input appears to be) consistency - between individual data el…
Common Consequences (3)
Availability DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
An attacker could provide unexpected values and cause a program crash or arbitrary control of resource allocation, leading to excessive consumption of resources such as memory and CPU.
Confidentiality Read Memory, Read Files or Directories
An attacker could read confidential data if they are able to control resource references.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
An attacker could use malicious input to modify data or possibly alter control flow in unexpected ways, including arbitrary command execution.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Consider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build "recognizers" for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subjec…
Architecture and Design Use an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
Architecture and Design, Implementation Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may b…
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Effectiveness: High
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server. Even though clien…
Examples (2)
This example demonstrates a shopping interaction in which the user is free to specify the quantity of items to be purchased and a total is calculated.
... public static final double price = 20.00; int quantity = currentUser.getAttribute("quantity"); double total = price * quantity; chargeUser(total); ...
Bad · Java
This example asks the user for a height and width of an m X n game board with a maximum dimension of 100 squares.
... #define MAX_DIM 100 ... /* board dimensions */ int m,n, error; board_square_t *board; printf("Please specify the board height: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &m); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } printf("Please specify the board width: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &n); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } if ( m > MAX_DIM || n > MAX_DIM ) { die("Value too large: Die evil hacker!\n"); } board = (board_square_t*) malloc( m * n * sizeof(board_square_t)); ...
Bad · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-12342 SailPoint IdentityIQ Improper Form Validation Vulnerability — IdentityIQ 9.6 Critical 2026-09-28
CVE-2026-12267 Authenticated PowerShell Injection in DNS Query Resolution Policy leads to RCE — DDI Central 7.2 High 2026-09-28
CVE-2026-12268 Authenticated PowerShell Injection leads to RCE — DDI Central 8.8 High 2026-09-28
CVE-2026-88771 A remote code execution vulnerability exists due to improper input validation, which can allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands — ADC 9.5 Critical 2026-09-27
CVE-2026-100833 Contrast before 1.23.1 Image Substitution via Policy Generation — contrast 9.6 Critical 2026-09-27
CVE-2026-100699 Nodemailer before 10.0.9 Malformed Envelope Recipient via RFC 5322 Comment — nodemailer 5.3 Medium 2026-09-26
CVE-2026-100663 Netty HTTP/1 CONNECT authority-form mistranslated to malformed HTTP/3 — netty 7.5 High 2026-09-26
CVE-2026-100664 Netty 4.2.2 through 4.2.17 HTTP/1 Host Header Authority Confusion — netty 7.5 High 2026-09-26
CVE-2026-100652 vLLM 0.22.0 through 0.23.0 Denial of Service via stop_token_ids — vllm 5.9 Medium 2026-09-26
CVE-2026-100647 vLLM before 0.29.0 CPU Exhaustion via unbounded cache_salt — vllm 5.3 Medium 2026-09-26
CVE-2026-63206 Zammad: Remote image tracking bypass via shortened URL scheme — zammad 5.3 Medium 2026-09-25
CVE-2026-84462 Zammad: AI Agent template sanitizer bypass leads to remote code execution — zammad 8.6 High 2026-09-25
CVE-2026-56732 Zammad: Malicious input in Ticket Body Enables Session Termination — zammad 5.3 Medium 2026-09-25
CVE-2026-94445 Malicious user input may lead to RCE in golang.org/x/playground — golang.org/x/playground - - 2026-09-25
CVE-2026-67234 RabbitMQ: Non-RFC-conformant cookie name when clearing the auth-mechanism preference — rabbitmq-server 2.3 Low 2026-09-25
CVE-2026-85750 Piwigo arbitrary file read and remote code execution via insecure image processing — Piwigo 7.2 High 2026-09-25
CVE-2026-100187 AIL Framework Onion Module: Non-Onion URL Accepted as Crawler Task Due to Bypassed Domain Validation — ail framework 6.9 Medium 2026-09-25
CVE-2026-91134 Discourse: Block post iframes whose encoded userinfo bypasses the allowed_iframes allowlist — discourse 5.4 Medium 2026-09-24
CVE-2026-47132 phpMyFAQ: SQL LIKE Wildcard Injection in Chat User Search Allows Authenticated User Enumeration — phpMyFAQ 5.4 Medium 2026-09-24
CVE-2025-32000 Insufficient Input Sanitization is addressed in HCL Sametime 12.0.4. It is recommended to upgrade to the latest version. — HCL Sametime 4.3 Medium 2026-09-24
CVE-2026-17503 This Power System update is being released to address — PowerVM Hypervisor 5.1 Medium 2026-09-24
CVE-2026-77797 Velociraptor Prefetch parser out of bounds — Velociraptor 3.6 Low 2026-09-24
CVE-2026-82407 Klever-Go: Validator registration accepts an unvalidated BLS public key → consensus liveness DoS — klever-go 7.0 High 2026-09-23
CVE-2026-95843 Moquette malformed shared subscriptions can crash command processing — moquette 8.7 High 2026-09-23
CVE-2026-62998 REDAXO: Unwhitelisted ORDER BY Column in rex_list Allows Authenticated Column Enumeration — core 4.3 Medium 2026-09-23
CVE-2026-86679 Broken Access Control vulnerability — ManageEngine Applications Manager 7.1 High 2026-09-23
CVE-2026-86683 Broken Authentication Vulnerability — ManageEngine Applications Manager 8.1 High 2026-09-23
CVE-2026-76980 Data Exposure vulnerability — ManageEngine OpManager 7.4 High 2026-09-23
CVE-2026-63628 mppx: Gas Draining with access list — mppx 6.9 Medium 2026-09-22
CVE-2026-63627 mppx: Gas Draining with padding — mppx 6.9 Medium 2026-09-22

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) represent 4415 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.