Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) — Vulnerability Class 2060

2060 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-94 represents a critical code injection weakness where software constructs executable code using untrusted input without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts or commands into user-supplied fields, such as web forms or API parameters, which the application then executes directly. This allows adversaries to bypass security controls, steal sensitive data, or gain unauthorized administrative access to the underlying system. To prevent such exploits, developers must rigorously validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected characters are processed. Implementing strict allow-listing strategies, utilizing parameterized queries for database interactions, and avoiding dynamic code execution functions like eval() are essential defensive measures. By treating all user input as potentially hostile and applying robust encoding techniques, organizations can effectively neutralize injection vectors and maintain application integrity.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Common Consequences (4)
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
In some cases, injectable code controls authentication; this may lead to a remote vulnerability.
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Injected code can access resources that the attacker is directly prevented from accessing.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
When a product allows a user's input to contain code syntax, it might be possible for an attacker to craft the code in such a way that it will alter the intended control flow of the product. As a result, code injection can often result in the execution of arbitrary code. Code injection attacks can…
Non-Repudiation Hide Activities
Often the actions performed by injected control code are unlogged.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Architecture and Design Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating s…
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Testing Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Operation Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Examples (2)
This example attempts to write user messages to a message file and allow users to view them.
$MessageFile = "messages.out"; if ($_GET["action"] == "NewMessage") { $name = $_GET["name"]; $message = $_GET["message"]; $handle = fopen($MessageFile, "a+"); fwrite($handle, "<b>$name</b> says '$message'<hr>\n"); fclose($handle); echo "Message Saved!<p>\n"; } else if ($_GET["action"] == "ViewMessages") { include($MessageFile); }
Bad · PHP
name=h4x0r message=%3C?php%20system(%22/bin/ls%20-l%22);?%3E
Attack
edit-config.pl: This CGI script is used to modify settings in a configuration file.
use CGI qw(:standard); sub config_file_add_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to add a field/key to a file goes here } sub config_file_set_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to set key to a particular file goes here } sub config_file_delete_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to delete key from a particular file goes here } sub handleConfigAction { my ($fname, $action) = @_; my $key = param('key'); my $val = param('val'); # this is super-efficient code, especially if you have to invoke # any one of dozens of different functions! my $code = "config_file_$action_key(\$fnam
Bad · Perl
add_key(",","); system("/bin/ls");
Attack
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-85359 Windows Performance Monitor Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1607 7.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-83759 Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1607 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-102863 Microsoft Office SharePoint Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Microsoft SharePoint Server Subscription Edition 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-103572 Visual Studio Tools for Applications and SQL Server Management Studio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.14 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108385 dataclasses-avroschema enum symbols can inject statements through generated member names — dataclasses-avroschema 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108384 dataclasses-avroschema allows code injection through fixed-type aliases supplied as a bare string — dataclasses-avroschema 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108383 dataclasses-avroschema enum field defaults can inject statements into generated modules — dataclasses-avroschema 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108382 dataclasses-avroschema allows code injection through generated enum-symbol string literals — dataclasses-avroschema 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108381 dataclasses-avroschema pydantic-class metadata allows code injection in generated annotations — dataclasses-avroschema 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108380 dataclasses-avroschema field documentation allows code injection in generated Pydantic descriptions — dataclasses-avroschema 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108379 dataclasses-avroschema fixed namespaces allow code injection in generated annotations — dataclasses-avroschema 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108378 dataclasses-avroschema record documentation can terminate generated class docstrings — dataclasses-avroschema 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108377 dataclasses-avroschema allows code injection through generated Meta.schema_name — dataclasses-avroschema 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108376 dataclasses-avroschema allows code injection through record names in generated default factories — dataclasses-avroschema 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108375 dataclasses-avroschema allows code injection through generated field-default literals — dataclasses-avroschema 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-104126 JumpServer: Ansible Automation Template Rendering Allows Unsafe Lookup Plugin Invocation — jumpserver 6.0 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-55695 FearlessCMS: Remote Code Execution via Unvalidated Update Repository URL in System Updater — FearlessCMS 9.1 Critical 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-103965 Fixed values in MongoDB Server $bucket stage may be misread as field references — MongoDB Server 5.4 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-55675 Salty documentation workflow executes fork-controlled Python build hooks with deployment secrets — docs 10.0 Critical 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108962 storyicon comfyui_segment_anything GroundingDINO Model Loading slconfig.py SLConfig._file2dict code injection — comfyui_segment_anything 6.3 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108961 PaddlePaddle PaddleX Preprocessor processors.py NormalizeImage.__init__ code injection — PaddleX 6.3 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108957 TinyLLaVA TinyLLaVA_Factory TinyLlavaConfig configuration_tinyllava.py _load_text_config code injection — TinyLLaVA_Factory 6.3 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108945 iMoonLab yolov13 AutoBackend Model Loading autobackend.py eval code injection — yolov13 5.3 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108944 repository RAE Config-Driven Model Instantiation model_utils.py get_obj_from_str code injection — RAE 4.8 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-89107 Code Injection vulnerability in SAP S/4HANA (Manage Substitution/Validation Rules) — SAP S/4HANA (Manage Substitution/Validation Rules) 9.9 Critical 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108943 ModelTC LightX2V Tokenizer cosmos3_runner.py AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained code injection — LightX2V 5.3 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108941 Linketic CityGaussian Sidecar Parsing common.py parse_cfg_args code injection — CityGaussian 4.8 Medium 2026-10-12
CVE-2026-96119 IBM i is Affected By An Improper Control of Code Generation Vulnerability in HTTP Server Administration GUI — i 9.9 Critical 2026-10-12
CVE-2026-82108 DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data Code Injection — DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 8.8 High 2026-10-12
CVE-2026-90920 Maximo AI Service Code Injection — Maximo AI Service 9.8 Critical 2026-10-12

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) represent 2060 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.