目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1359 元

100%

CVE-2026-105932— Apache Pulsar 非持久主题过滤器端点未授权漏洞

一分钟漏洞结论

影响对象
Apache Software Foundation Apache Pulsar
利用判断
尚无明确在野利用证据,仍需结合暴露面评估
建议动作
优先检查厂商安全公告和参考链接中的修复版本;无法立即升级时,限制受影响服务暴露并加强监测。

Apache Pulsar 的 Broker 管理 REST API 提供了用于读取、设置和移除主题级(topic-level)消息条目过滤策略(entry filter policy)的端点。对于持久化主题(persistent topics),这些端点会检查调用者是否拥有执行条目过滤策略操作的授权。然而,对应于非持久化主题(non-persistent topics)的端点( )并未执行此项授权检查。这些端点仅执行一项间接的查找权限检查,该检查发生在获取主题分区元数据的过程中,且存在于所有受影响版本中。 因此,

CVSS 2.3 · Low

影响版本矩阵 2

厂商产品 版本范围状态
Apache Software Foundation Apache Pulsar 3.3.0< 4.0.14 affected
4.1.0< 4.2.5 affected
获取后续新漏洞提醒 登录后订阅

一、 漏洞 CVE-2026-105932 基础信息

漏洞信息

对漏洞内容有疑问?看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助!
查看神龙十问 ↗

尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术,但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性,但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。

Vulnerability Title
Apache Pulsar: Missing topic policy authorization on non-persistent topic entry filter endpoints
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
The Apache Pulsar broker admin REST API provides endpoints to read, set and remove the topic-level entry filter policy of a topic. For persistent topics these endpoints check that the caller is authorized for the entry filters topic policy operation. The corresponding endpoints for non-persistent topics (/admin/v2/non-persistent/{tenant}/{namespace}/{topic}/entryFilters) do not perform this authorization check. The only authorization check these endpoints perform is an indirect lookup permission check, made while the topic's partition metadata is retrieved; it is present in all affected versions. As a result, when authentication and authorization are enabled, an authenticated user who has been granted produce or consume permission on a non-persistent topic, or on its namespace, but not permission to manage the topic's policies can read, replace or remove the topic-level entry filter policy of that topic. These operations should be restricted to users with the tenant admin role or the superuser role. This impact analysis assumes that Pulsar has been configured with the default authorization provider. For custom authorization providers, the impact could be slightly different. The practical impact is limited by two broker configuration requirements, neither of which is met by default: - Entry filters must have been installed by the operator. Entry filter implementations are loaded only at broker startup from the broker's entry filters directory, which is empty by default. A request can only select among entry filters the operator has already deployed; setting any other filter name is rejected. The issue does not allow a caller to install or load entry filter code or to run arbitrary code in the broker. - Topic-level entry filter policies must be allowed to override the broker-level configuration (allowOverrideEntryFilters, which is disabled by default). When this setting is disabled, the topic-level entry filter policy has no effect on message dispatch. In deployments where both conditions are met, an unauthorized user can remove the topic-level entry filter policy of a non-persistent topic, for example one used to restrict which messages are delivered to consumers, or apply a different installed entry filter that withholds messages from subscriptions of that topic. Removing it makes the topic fall back to the namespace-level or broker-level entry filters, which are not removed. A changed policy affects only subscription dispatchers created after the change, for example for new subscriptions or when a subscription is re-created after all of its consumers have disconnected; dispatchers that already exist keep the entry filters they were created with. Because non-persistent topics do not store messages, messages withheld by an entry filter are not delivered. Reading the policy discloses only the names of the configured entry filters. The issue does not allow reading message contents, and entry filters cannot modify message payloads. Persistent topics and namespace-level entry filter policies are not affected. Apache Pulsar versions before 3.3.0 are not affected, because in those versions the entry filters topic policy check is made in code shared by the persistent and non-persistent endpoints. This issue affects Apache Pulsar versions from 3.3.0 before 4.0.14 and from 4.1.0 before 4.2.5. - 3.3.x and 4.0.x version users should upgrade to at least 4.0.14. - 4.1.x and 4.2.x version users should upgrade to at least 4.2.5. Users operating versions prior to those listed above should upgrade to the aforementioned patched versions or newer versions. The currently supported Apache Pulsar release lines are 4.0.x and 5.0.x. The supported versions schedule is available at https://pulsar.apache.org/contribute/release-policy/. Users who cannot upgrade immediately and have deployed entry filters should keep allowOverrideEntryFilters at its default value of false, so that topic-level entry filter policies do not affect message dispatch.
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
授权机制缺失
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5

受影响产品

厂商 产品 影响版本 CPE 订阅
Apache Software Foundation Apache Pulsar 3.3.0 ~ 4.0.14 -

二、漏洞 CVE-2026-105932 的公开POC

# POC 描述 源链接 神龙链接
AI 生成 POC 高级

未找到公开 POC。

登录以生成 AI POC

三、漏洞 CVE-2026-105932 的情报信息

请登录查看更多情报信息。

CVE-2026-105932 其他参考 (2)

同批安全公告 · Apache Software Foundation · 2026-10-21 · 共 69 条

CVE-2026-105944 10.0 CRITICAL Apache Pulsar Manager 认证绕过及凭证泄露漏洞
CVE-2026-111812 10.0 CRITICAL Apache Traffic Server 远程代码执行漏洞
CVE-2026-111813 10.0 CRITICAL Apache Traffic Server magick 插件远程代码执行漏洞
CVE-2026-111815 10.0 CRITICAL Apache Traffic Server TLS 会话恢复绕过 SNI 验证漏洞
CVE-2026-111814 10.0 CRITICAL Apache Traffic Server mTLS 身份混淆漏洞
CVE-2026-111809 9.3 CRITICAL Apache Traffic Server 请求走私漏洞
CVE-2026-111816 9.3 CRITICAL Apache Traffic Server 302 响应绕过解析漏洞
CVE-2026-105869 9.2 CRITICAL Apache Pulsar 未验证令牌角色认证绕过漏洞
CVE-2026-111811 9.0 CRITICAL Apache Traffic Server tsmemcache 插件未认证缓存漏洞
CVE-2025-31699 8.9 HIGH Apache Traffic Server 请求走私漏洞
CVE-2026-105937 8.7 HIGH Apache Pulsar 影子主题源授权缺失漏洞
CVE-2025-55702 8.7 HIGH Apache Traffic Server 请求解析漏洞
CVE-2026-111808 8.6 HIGH Apache Traffic Server HTTP/2 资源耗尽漏洞
CVE-2026-111805 8.6 HIGH Apache Traffic Server HTTP/2 后端工作池耗尽漏洞
CVE-2026-111804 8.2 HIGH Apache Traffic Server wasm 插件释放后使用漏洞
CVE-2026-105945 7.7 HIGH Apache Pulsar 文件存储跨租户包访问漏洞
CVE-2026-105942 7.7 HIGH Apache Pulsar 代理请求权限提升漏洞
CVE-2026-111810 7.5 HIGH Apache Traffic Server 未限流日志导致拒绝服务漏洞
CVE-2026-105934 7.2 HIGH Apache Pulsar 截断分区主题租户管理授权绕过漏洞
CVE-2026-105930 6.0 MEDIUM Apache Pulsar 函数包 URL 跨租户下载漏洞

显示前 20 条,共 69 条。 查看全部 &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-105932

暂无评论


发表评论