目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1336

100%

CVE-2026-82430— Apache Storm 容器命令文件本地提权至Root漏洞

一分钟漏洞结论

影响对象
Apache Software Foundation Apache Storm Worker Launcher
利用判断
尚无明确在野利用证据,仍需结合暴露面评估
建议动作
优先检查厂商安全公告和参考链接中的修复版本;无法立即升级时,限制受影响服务暴露并加强监测。

以下是对该漏洞描述的中文翻译: 描述 在启动 Docker 或 OCI 工作进程(worker)时,以 setuid-root 权限运行的 会首先将整个工作进程目录的所有权更改为不受信任的拓扑(topology)用户,之后才读取并执行由 supervisor 写入同一目录中的命令文件。由于该文件在打开时未使用 标志,且未重新验证其所有者,因此在所有权变更和读取之间,租户(tenant)可以替换文件内容。 对于 Docker 路径:解析出的命令会以实际 uid 为 0(即 root)执行,且命令净化器(sanitis

AI 预测 9.8 利用难度: 中等
获取后续新漏洞提醒 登录后订阅

一、 漏洞 CVE-2026-82430 基础信息

漏洞信息

对漏洞内容有疑问?看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助!
查看神龙十问 ↗

尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术,但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性,但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。

Vulnerability Title
Apache Storm Worker Launcher: Local Privilege Escalation to Root via Container Command Files Chowned to the Tenant
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
Description When launching a Docker or OCI worker, the setuid-root `worker-launcher` first changes ownership of the entire worker directory to the untrusted topology user, and only afterwards reads and acts on the command file that the supervisor wrote into that same directory. The file is opened without `O_NOFOLLOW` and without re-verifying its owner, so between the ownership change and the read the tenant can replace its contents. For the Docker path the parsed command is executed with real uid 0, and the command sanitiser is not a privilege boundary: it admits `-v` with an arbitrary source, `--device`, `--cap-add`, `--security-opt`, `--user` and `--net`, and copies positional arguments through verbatim. A rewritten file therefore yields an attacker-authored, root-equivalent container invocation with the host filesystem available. For the OCI path the same rewrite window applies, and mount validation is structural only, with no source or destination allow-list, so arbitrary host paths can be bind-mounted read-write into the container. The `username` field of the command file is likewise attacker-settable and is checked only against non-root and minimum-uid rules, permitting execution as another tenant's uid. Mitigation Upgrade to 3.1.0, where the command file is validated before the ownership change and re-verified on open, and where mount sources and destinations are constrained by configuration. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should disable Docker and OCI worker isolation, or restrict topology submission on affected supervisors to trusted principals. Note that the launcher must be rebuilt and reinstalled after upgrading. Credit The ASF -- found using Claude agents to study the security of open-source projects, validated and reported by Apache Storm.
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
检查时间与使用时间(TOCTOU)的竞争条件
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5

受影响产品

厂商 产品 影响版本 CPE 订阅
Apache Software Foundation Apache Storm Worker Launcher 3.0.0 ~ 3.1.0 -

二、漏洞 CVE-2026-82430 的公开POC

# POC 描述 源链接 神龙链接
AI 生成 POC 高级

未找到公开 POC。

登录以生成 AI POC

三、漏洞 CVE-2026-82430 的情报信息

登录查看更多情报信息。

CVE-2026-82430 其他参考 (1)

同批安全公告 · Apache Software Foundation · 2026-09-14 · 共 39 条

CVE-2026-82434 10.0 CRITICAL Apache Storm 向只读用户及日志泄露ZK凭证
CVE-2026-78330 Apache Syncope 管理员JWT权限提升漏洞
CVE-2026-73579 Apache Syncope 非递归Any搜索绕过Realm限制
CVE-2026-75015 Apache Syncope 嵌套密钥泄露明文的审计记录
CVE-2026-75030 Apache Syncope 组成员权限检查不完整漏洞
CVE-2026-77051 Apache Syncope SQL注入漏洞
CVE-2026-73668 Apache Syncope 机密ConnId配置跨域泄露
CVE-2026-77147 Apache Syncope Groovy沙箱逃逸漏洞
CVE-2026-77181 Apache Syncope 客户端应用更新权限失效
CVE-2026-77883 Apache Syncope JEXL导航致信息泄露
CVE-2026-78318 Apache Syncope 控制台反射型XSS漏洞
CVE-2026-73470 Apache Syncope 非所有者角色授权越权漏洞
CVE-2026-78336 Apache Syncope OIDC提供者列表信息泄露漏洞
CVE-2026-82232 Apache Syncope 任务搜索SQL注入
CVE-2026-86460 Apache Syncope FIQL查询Cypher注入漏洞
CVE-2026-87779 Apache Syncope AES密钥泄露
CVE-2026-87785 Apache Syncope JWT主体欺骗漏洞
CVE-2026-87802 Apache Syncope 远程代码执行漏洞
CVE-2026-68570 Apache Doris 授权绕过导致未授权数据访问漏洞
CVE-2026-72524 Apache Doris 授权绕过导致任意表读写删

显示前 20 条,共 39 条。 查看全部 → →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-82430

暂无评论


发表评论