在 389-ds-base 中发现了一个漏洞。未认证的远程攻击者可以在同一个连接上先发送一个完整的 LDAP 操作,紧接着发送一个不完整的 LDAPMessage 的前几个字节,导致服务器在该第一个工作线程的结果尚未刷出之前,将该连接分配给第二个工作线程。第二个工作线程在持有连接互斥锁的情况下,会阻塞直到 nsslapd-ioblocktimeout 超时时间,从而阻止了已完成操作的结果发送。通过在数量较少(与配置的 Worker 线程池大小成比例)的连接上重复执行上述操作,在默认配置下将耗尽整个线程池,导致所有客
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Directory Server 11 | any |
affected |
any |
affected | ||
| Red Hat | Red Hat Directory Server 12 | any |
affected |
any |
affected | ||
| Red Hat | Red Hat Directory Server 13 | any |
affected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | any |
affected |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | any |
unknown |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | any |
unknown |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | any |
affected |
any |
affected | ||
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | any |
affected |
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| Vendor | Product | Affected Versions | CPE | Subscribe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Directory Server 11 | - |
cpe:/a:redhat:directory_server:11
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Directory Server 11 | - |
cpe:/a:redhat:directory_server:11
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Directory Server 12 | - |
cpe:/a:redhat:directory_server:12
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Directory Server 12 | - |
cpe:/a:redhat:directory_server:12
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Directory Server 13 | - |
cpe:/a:redhat:directory_server:13
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 | - |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | - |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | - |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | - |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | - |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8
|
|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 | - |
cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9
|
|
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-96658 | 9.9 CRITICAL | Foreman: safemode bypass leading to rce |
| CVE-2026-96659 | 9.1 CRITICAL | Foreman: excessive permissions for viewer role on preview |
| CVE-2026-86345 | 9.0 CRITICAL | 389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: starttls plaintext-buffer retention allows on-path attacker to f |
| CVE-2026-12405 | 8.8 HIGH | Rubygem-foreman_remote_execution: command injection in job invocations via effective_user |
| CVE-2026-12541 | 8.2 HIGH | Foreman: command injection in foreman-rake database tasks |
| CVE-2026-12540 | 8.2 HIGH | Foreman: command injection in foreman-rake errors:fetch_log via request_id parameter |
| CVE-2026-12544 | 7.7 HIGH | Foreman: ssti and insecure deserialization in foreman-rake configuration |
| CVE-2026-12423 | 7.5 HIGH | Foreman: unauthenticated information disclosure via provisioning token validation flaw |
| CVE-2026-96577 | 7.1 HIGH | Oc-mirror__release-4.21: embedded local cache registry listens on all interfaces without a |
| CVE-2026-12545 | 6.7 MEDIUM | Rubygem-hammer_cli: command injection via insecure editor invocation |
| CVE-2026-103884 | 6.5 MEDIUM | Keycloak-services: keycloak-services: path traversal in x.509 crl distribution point allow |
| CVE-2026-56097 | 6.5 MEDIUM | Rubygem-katello: sql injection in registry proxy via labels |
| CVE-2026-83589 | 6.1 MEDIUM | Oauth-proxy: open redirect via /\ and /\t bypass in post-login redirect |
| CVE-2026-103754 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ansible-runner: ansible-runner: path traversal and symlink escape in unstream_dir() allows |
| CVE-2026-103641 | 5.5 MEDIUM | Gegl: gegl04: gegl: out-of-bounds read in the radiance hdr uncompressed scanline decoder |
| CVE-2026-12542 | 5.3 MEDIUM | Foreman: command injection in foreman-tail |
| CVE-2026-56098 | 4.3 MEDIUM | Rubygem-katello: improper authorization logic allows resource enumeration |
No comments yet