Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%
Buy Us a Coffee

CVE-2026-14457— RPK Server Signature Algorithm Selection Can Dereference a Missing Certificate

Quick assessment

Affected
OpenSSL OpenSSL
Exploitation
No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation; assess based on exposure
Recommended action
Check the vendor advisory and references for a fixed version. If immediate upgrade is impossible, restrict exposure and increase monitoring.

问题摘要：在启用了 RFC7250 原始公钥（Raw Public Keys, RPKs）的服务器或客户端配置中，如果本地仅配置了私钥（而未配置关联的证书），当远程对等方请求使用原始公钥，并同时发送通常会被省略的 "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS 扩展时，可能发生空指针解引用漏洞。 影响摘要：该漏洞的影响仅限于可能导致的应用程序中止从而引发的拒绝服务（DoS）攻击；不可能发生数据泄露或远程命令执行。 CWE：CWE-476：空指针解引用 描述：文档中的示例代码中有一段注释表明，仅使用密

AI Predicted 5.9 Difficulty: Easy
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilities Log in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2026-14457

Vulnerability Information
Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
RPK Server Signature Algorithm Selection Can Dereference a Missing Certificate
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally, a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and also sends the typically omitted "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension. Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible. CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or signed by any convenient CA). When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the "signature_algorithms_cert" extension is handled reliably even without the fix, and peer clients or servers that don't support raw public keys may be able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding certificate or its public key. Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below. FIPS impact: no No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the SSL protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
空指针解引用
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5

Affected Products

Vendor Product Affected Versions CPE Subscribe
OpenSSL OpenSSL 4.0.0 ~ 4.0.2 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2026-14457

# POC Description Source Link Shenlong Link
AI-Generated POC Premium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2026-14457

请登录查看更多情报信息。

Patches & Fixes for CVE-2026-14457 (4)

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-14457 (1)

Same Patch Batch · OpenSSL · 2026-08-25 · 9 CVEs total

CVE-2026-75803 AEAD Forgeries with Empty Ciphertext When Using EVP_Cipher()
CVE-2026-18798 QUIC Server May Trigger Double Free When Processing INITIAL Packet
CVE-2026-54874 Excessive Memory Use Buffering DTLS Records for a Future Epoch
CVE-2026-63074 CMP Indefinite Cache Growth of ExtraCerts
CVE-2026-63072 Heap Buffer Overflow in CMS Key Unwrapping
CVE-2026-63073 Untrusted Sender DN Used as Format String in CMP Response Validation
CVE-2026-63075 QUIC ACK-only Packet Retention Can Cause Memory Exhaustion
CVE-2026-63076 Invalid Pointer Dereference in CMP Server via Crafted protectionAlg

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

Same product: OpenSSL
Same vendor: OpenSSL
Same weakness: CWE-476

V. Comments for CVE-2026-14457

No comments yet

Leave a comment