Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) — Vulnerability Class 2058

2058 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-94 represents a critical code injection weakness where software constructs executable code using untrusted input without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts or commands into user-supplied fields, such as web forms or API parameters, which the application then executes directly. This allows adversaries to bypass security controls, steal sensitive data, or gain unauthorized administrative access to the underlying system. To prevent such exploits, developers must rigorously validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected characters are processed. Implementing strict allow-listing strategies, utilizing parameterized queries for database interactions, and avoiding dynamic code execution functions like eval() are essential defensive measures. By treating all user input as potentially hostile and applying robust encoding techniques, organizations can effectively neutralize injection vectors and maintain application integrity.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Common Consequences (4)
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
In some cases, injectable code controls authentication; this may lead to a remote vulnerability.
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Injected code can access resources that the attacker is directly prevented from accessing.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
When a product allows a user's input to contain code syntax, it might be possible for an attacker to craft the code in such a way that it will alter the intended control flow of the product. As a result, code injection can often result in the execution of arbitrary code. Code injection attacks can…
Non-Repudiation Hide Activities
Often the actions performed by injected control code are unlogged.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Architecture and Design Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating s…
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Testing Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Operation Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Examples (2)
This example attempts to write user messages to a message file and allow users to view them.
$MessageFile = "messages.out"; if ($_GET["action"] == "NewMessage") { $name = $_GET["name"]; $message = $_GET["message"]; $handle = fopen($MessageFile, "a+"); fwrite($handle, "<b>$name</b> says '$message'<hr>\n"); fclose($handle); echo "Message Saved!<p>\n"; } else if ($_GET["action"] == "ViewMessages") { include($MessageFile); }
Bad · PHP
name=h4x0r message=%3C?php%20system(%22/bin/ls%20-l%22);?%3E
Attack
edit-config.pl: This CGI script is used to modify settings in a configuration file.
use CGI qw(:standard); sub config_file_add_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to add a field/key to a file goes here } sub config_file_set_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to set key to a particular file goes here } sub config_file_delete_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to delete key from a particular file goes here } sub handleConfigAction { my ($fname, $action) = @_; my $key = param('key'); my $val = param('val'); # this is super-efficient code, especially if you have to invoke # any one of dozens of different functions! my $code = "config_file_$action_key(\$fnam
Bad · Perl
add_key(",","); system("/bin/ls");
Attack
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-55543 TuxGuitar: Arbitrary Code Execution via maliciously crafted `.tg` file — tuxguitar 8.5 High 2026-10-16
CVE-2026-68571 Apache Kylin: JDBC URL Whitelist Verification Bypass — Apache Kylin - - 2026-10-16
CVE-2026-104003 Paid Membership Plugin, Ecommerce, User Registration Form, Login Form, User Profile & Restrict Content <= 4.17.5 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via Comment Content Rendered on ProfilePress User Profile 'Comments' Tab — Paid Membership Plugin, Ecommerce, User Registration Form, Login Form, User Profile & Restrict Content – ProfilePress 5.4 Medium 2026-10-16
CVE-2026-94169 WordPress The Grid plugin <= 2.8.1 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — The Grid 10.0 Critical 2026-10-16
CVE-2026-15222 User Registration & Membership <= 5.2.8 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via display_name — User Registration & Membership – Free & Paid Memberships, Subscriptions, Content Restriction, User Profile, Custom User Registration & Login Builder 5.4 Medium 2026-10-16
CVE-2026-104001 Slim SEO <= 4.11.1 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via 'Biographical Info' User Meta — Slim SEO – AI SEO Plugin, Lightweight, Fast & Automated 5.4 Medium 2026-10-16
CVE-2026-103911 Forminator Forms <= 1.58.1 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via 's' Search Parameter and Anonymous Comment via render_block — Forminator Forms – Contact Form, Payment Form & Custom Form Builder 6.5 Medium 2026-10-16
CVE-2026-101335 Forminator Forms <= 1.58.1 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via 'User-Agent' Header and 'referer_url' Parameter via Quiz Notification Merge Tags — Forminator Forms – Contact Form, Payment Form & Custom Form Builder 6.5 Medium 2026-10-16
CVE-2026-96562 Broken Link Checker <= 2.4.14.1 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via parser_callback — Broken Link Checker 6.5 Medium 2026-10-16
CVE-2026-100159 Popup Box 6.4.1 - 6.4.2 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via Client-IP / X-Forwarded-For HTTP Headers — Popup Box – Create Countdown, Coupon, Video, Contact Form Popups 4.8 Medium 2026-10-16
CVE-2026-102389 WordPress Broken Link Checker plugin <= 2.4.14.1 - Content Injection vulnerability — Broken Link Checker 6.5 Medium 2026-10-15
CVE-2026-86803 Ocean Extra <= 2.6.0 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via 'oceanwp_library' Shortcode Template — Ocean Extra 6.5 Medium 2026-10-15
CVE-2026-54566 Markdown Preview Enhanced: Remote Code Execution via VM Sandbox Escape in `.crossnote/config.js` and `.crossnote/parser.js` — vscode-markdown-preview-enhanced 8.5 High 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-85714 Stirling-PDF: Remote Code Execution via H2 — Stirling-PDF 9.1 Critical 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-108151 WordPress MDTF plugin <= 1.3.9 - Arbitrary Code Execution vulnerability — MDTF 5.3 Medium 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-103081 WordPress Salevo plugin <= 1.3.0 - Content Injection vulnerability — Salevo 7.5 High 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-0322 PAN-OS: Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in the Management Interface — Cloud NGFW 8.5 High 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-73800 Gitea reusable workflow secret exposure in pull_request_target — Gitea - - 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-103358 WordPress Email Template Customizer for WooCommerce plugin <= 1.3.4 - Content Injection vulnerability — Email Template Customizer for WooCommerce 7.5 High 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-110445 TEAMPLUS TECHNOLOGY|TeamPlus Messenger - Code Injection — TeamPlus Messenger 8.8 High 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-110444 TEAMPLUS TECHNOLOGY|TeamPlus Messenger - Code Injection — TeamPlus Messenger 8.8 High 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-92097 Click to Chat <= 4.44 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via REQUEST_URI via {url} Placeholder — Click to Chat – HoliThemes 9.1 Critical 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-106624 ColdFusion | Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') (CWE-94) — ColdFusion 2025 10.0 Critical 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-106621 ColdFusion | Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') (CWE-94) — ColdFusion 2025 9.1 Critical 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-105903 ColdFusion | Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') (CWE-94) — ColdFusion 2025 9.9 Critical 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-63146 Omnispace Agora Project < 26.10.0 PHP Code Injection via config.inc.php — Agora Project 9.8 Critical 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-102870 ASP.NET Core Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft Visual Studio 2022 version 17.14 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-96220 Windows Assigned Access Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 7.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-85359 Windows Performance Monitor Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1607 7.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-83759 Windows Encrypting File System (EFS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1607 8.8 High 2026-10-13

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) represent 2058 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.