Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) — Vulnerability Class 2063

2063 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-94 represents a critical code injection weakness where software constructs executable code using untrusted input without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts or commands into user-supplied fields, such as web forms or API parameters, which the application then executes directly. This allows adversaries to bypass security controls, steal sensitive data, or gain unauthorized administrative access to the underlying system. To prevent such exploits, developers must rigorously validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected characters are processed. Implementing strict allow-listing strategies, utilizing parameterized queries for database interactions, and avoiding dynamic code execution functions like eval() are essential defensive measures. By treating all user input as potentially hostile and applying robust encoding techniques, organizations can effectively neutralize injection vectors and maintain application integrity.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Common Consequences (4)
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
In some cases, injectable code controls authentication; this may lead to a remote vulnerability.
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Injected code can access resources that the attacker is directly prevented from accessing.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
When a product allows a user's input to contain code syntax, it might be possible for an attacker to craft the code in such a way that it will alter the intended control flow of the product. As a result, code injection can often result in the execution of arbitrary code. Code injection attacks can…
Non-Repudiation Hide Activities
Often the actions performed by injected control code are unlogged.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Architecture and Design Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating s…
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Testing Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Operation Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Examples (2)
This example attempts to write user messages to a message file and allow users to view them.
$MessageFile = "messages.out"; if ($_GET["action"] == "NewMessage") { $name = $_GET["name"]; $message = $_GET["message"]; $handle = fopen($MessageFile, "a+"); fwrite($handle, "<b>$name</b> says '$message'<hr>\n"); fclose($handle); echo "Message Saved!<p>\n"; } else if ($_GET["action"] == "ViewMessages") { include($MessageFile); }
Bad · PHP
name=h4x0r message=%3C?php%20system(%22/bin/ls%20-l%22);?%3E
Attack
edit-config.pl: This CGI script is used to modify settings in a configuration file.
use CGI qw(:standard); sub config_file_add_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to add a field/key to a file goes here } sub config_file_set_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to set key to a particular file goes here } sub config_file_delete_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to delete key from a particular file goes here } sub handleConfigAction { my ($fname, $action) = @_; my $key = param('key'); my $val = param('val'); # this is super-efficient code, especially if you have to invoke # any one of dozens of different functions! my $code = "config_file_$action_key(\$fnam
Bad · Perl
add_key(",","); system("/bin/ls");
Attack
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-8838 Remote Code Execution via eval() Injection in amazon-redshift-python-driver — Amazon Redshift connector for Python 9.8 Critical 2026-05-18
CVE-2026-45829 chroma 代码注入漏洞 — ChromaDB - - 2026-05-18
CVE-2026-6902 Code Injection in Perforce P4 (Helix Core) — P4 (Helix Core) - - 2026-05-18
CVE-2018-25320 ACL Analytics 11.x - 13.0.0.579 Arbitrary Code Execution — ACL Analytics 9.8 Critical 2026-05-17
CVE-2021-47952 python jsonpickle 2.0.0 Remote Code Execution via py/repr — python jsonpickle 9.8 Critical 2026-05-16
CVE-2021-47964 Schlix CMS 2.2.6-6 Remote Code Execution via core.blockmanager — Schlix CMS 8.8 High 2026-05-15
CVE-2026-44717 MCP Calculate Server: Prompt Injection to RCE — mcp_calculate_server 9.8 Critical 2026-05-15
CVE-2026-41258 OpenMRS: Stored Velocity SSTI to RCE via ConceptReferenceRange — openmrs-core 9.1 Critical 2026-05-15
CVE-2026-35194 Apache Flink: Remote code execution via SQL injection in code generation — Apache Flink - - 2026-05-15
CVE-2026-8539 Google Chrome 代码注入漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-05-14
CVE-2026-8634 Crabbox < v0.12.0 Environment Variable Information Disclosure — crabbox 9.1 Critical 2026-05-14
CVE-2025-15024 RCE in Yordam Informatics' Library Automation System — Library Automation System 8.8 High 2026-05-14
CVE-2026-42555 Valtimo: SpEL injection via StandardEvaluationContext allows Remote Code Execution by admin users — valtimo 9.1 Critical 2026-05-14
CVE-2026-44827 Diffusers: None.py Trust Remote Code Bypass — diffusers 8.8 High 2026-05-14
CVE-2026-44513 Diffusers: `trust_remote_code` bypass via `custom_pipeline` and local custom components — diffusers 8.8 High 2026-05-14
CVE-2025-12669 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in GitLab — GitLab 5.4 Medium 2026-05-14
CVE-2026-45708 CubeCart: Authenticated RCE via Invoice Template → Order Print — v6 7.2 High 2026-05-13
CVE-2026-45714 CubeCart: Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) in Smarty Templates leading to RCE — v6 9.1 Critical 2026-05-13
CVE-2026-44377 CubeCart: Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) in Smarty Templates leading to RCE — v6 9.1 Critical 2026-05-13
CVE-2026-0236 Prisma Browser: Code Injection Enables Security Controls Bypass — Prisma Browser - - 2026-05-13
CVE-2026-44006 vm2: Sandbox Escape — vm2 10.0 Critical 2026-05-13
CVE-2026-43997 vm2: Sandbox Escape — vm2 10.0 Critical 2026-05-13
CVE-2026-44295 protobufjs-cli: Code injection in pbjs static output from crafted schema names — protobuf.js 8.7 High 2026-05-13
CVE-2026-44293 protobufjs: Code injection through bytes field defaults in generated toObject code — protobuf.js 7.7 High 2026-05-13
CVE-2026-44291 protobufjs: Code generation gadget after prototype pollution — protobuf.js 8.1 High 2026-05-13
CVE-2026-42288 ChurchCRM: Incomplete fix for CVE-2026-39337: Unauthenticated RCE in Setup Wizard via unsanitized DB_PASSWORD — CRM 10.0 Critical 2026-05-12
CVE-2025-15463 Advanced Custom Fields: Extended <= 0.9.2.3 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Shortcode Execution — Advanced Custom Fields: Extended 6.5 Medium 2026-05-12
CVE-2026-44262 Scramble: Remote code execution via evaluation of user-controlled input in validation rules — scramble 9.4 Critical 2026-05-12
CVE-2026-44403 Wing FTP Server < 8.1.3 Authenticated Remote Code Execution via Session Serialization — Wing FTP Server 7.2 High 2026-05-12
CVE-2026-8430 SPIP < 4.4.14 Remote Code Execution via nginx — SPIP 8.1 High 2026-05-12

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) represent 2063 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.