Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1752

1752 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-94 represents a critical code injection weakness where software constructs executable code using untrusted input without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts or commands into user-supplied fields, such as web forms or API parameters, which the application then executes directly. This allows adversaries to bypass security controls, steal sensitive data, or gain unauthorized administrative access to the underlying system. To prevent such exploits, developers must rigorously validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected characters are processed. Implementing strict allow-listing strategies, utilizing parameterized queries for database interactions, and avoiding dynamic code execution functions like eval() are essential defensive measures. By treating all user input as potentially hostile and applying robust encoding techniques, organizations can effectively neutralize injection vectors and maintain application integrity.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Common Consequences (4)
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
In some cases, injectable code controls authentication; this may lead to a remote vulnerability.
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Injected code can access resources that the attacker is directly prevented from accessing.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
When a product allows a user's input to contain code syntax, it might be possible for an attacker to craft the code in such a way that it will alter the intended control flow of the product. As a result, code injection can often result in the execution of arbitrary code. Code injection attacks can…
Non-Repudiation Hide Activities
Often the actions performed by injected control code are unlogged.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Architecture and Design Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating s…
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Testing Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Operation Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Examples (2)
This example attempts to write user messages to a message file and allow users to view them.
$MessageFile = "messages.out"; if ($_GET["action"] == "NewMessage") { $name = $_GET["name"]; $message = $_GET["message"]; $handle = fopen($MessageFile, "a+"); fwrite($handle, "<b>$name</b> says '$message'<hr>\n"); fclose($handle); echo "Message Saved!<p>\n"; } else if ($_GET["action"] == "ViewMessages") { include($MessageFile); }
Bad · PHP
name=h4x0r message=%3C?php%20system(%22/bin/ls%20-l%22);?%3E
Attack
edit-config.pl: This CGI script is used to modify settings in a configuration file.
use CGI qw(:standard); sub config_file_add_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to add a field/key to a file goes here } sub config_file_set_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to set key to a particular file goes here } sub config_file_delete_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to delete key from a particular file goes here } sub handleConfigAction { my ($fname, $action) = @_; my $key = param('key'); my $val = param('val'); # this is super-efficient code, especially if you have to invoke # any one of dozens of different functions! my $code = "config_file_$action_key(\$fnam
Bad · Perl
add_key(",","); system("/bin/ls");
Attack
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2025-67750 Lightning Flow Scanner is Vulnerable to Code Injection via Unsafe Use of new Function() in APIVersion Rule — lightning-flow-scanner 8.4 High 2025-12-12
CVE-2025-12843 Code Injection in Wave Term v0.12.2 allowing TCC Bypass — waveterm 8.4 - 2025-12-12
CVE-2025-67727 Parse Server GitHub CI workflow vulnerable to RCE through Improper Privilege Management — parse-server 9.8AI Critical AI 2025-12-12
CVE-2025-14166 WPMasterToolKit (WPMTK) <= 2.13.0 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Code Injection — WPMasterToolKit (WPMTK) – All in one plugin 5.3 Medium 2025-12-12
CVE-2025-67509 MySQLSelectTool Read-Only Bypass via SELECT INTO OUTFILE Allows Arbitrary File Write — neuron-ai 8.2 High 2025-12-10
CVE-2024-58284 PopojiCMS 2.0.1 Remote Command Execution via Authenticated Metadata Settings — PopojiCMS 7.2AI High AI 2025-12-10
CVE-2025-67489 @vitejs/plugin-rsc Remote Code Execution through unsafe dynamic imports in RSC server function APIs on development server — vite-plugin-react 9.8 Critical 2025-12-09
CVE-2025-66457 Elysia affected by arbitrary code injection through cookie config — elysia 8.8AI High AI 2025-12-09
CVE-2025-13642 ProfilePress <= 4.16.7 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Arbitrary Shortcode Execution — Paid Membership Plugin, Ecommerce, User Registration Form, Login Form, User Profile & Restrict Content – ProfilePress 5.4 Medium 2025-12-09
CVE-2025-66533 WordPress GiveWP plugin <= 4.13.1 - Arbitrary Shortocde Execution vulnerability — GiveWP 6.5 Medium 2025-12-09
CVE-2025-42880 Code Injection vulnerability in SAP Solution Manager — SAP Solution Manager 9.9 Critical 2025-12-09
CVE-2025-66222 DeepChat Cross-Site Scripting(XSS) escalate to Remote Code Execution(RCE) — deepchat 9.7 Critical 2025-12-03
CVE-2024-32641 Masa CMS Vulnerable to Pre-Auth RCE via JSON API — MasaCMS 9.8 Critical 2025-12-03
CVE-2025-13486 Advanced Custom Fields: Extended 0.9.0.5 - 0.9.1.1 - Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in prepare_form — Advanced Custom Fields: Extended 9.8 Critical 2025-12-03
CVE-2025-13658 Industrial Video & Control Longwatch has a Code Injection vulnerability — Longwatch 9.8AI Critical AI 2025-12-02
CVE-2025-66448 vLLM vulnerable to remote code execution via transformers_utils/get_config — vllm 7.1 High 2025-12-01
CVE-2025-66299 Security Sandbox Bypass with SSTI (Server Side Template Injection) in the Grav CMS — grav 8.8 High 2025-12-01
CVE-2025-66294 Grav is vulnerable to RCE via SSTI through Twig Sandbox Bypass — grav 7.2AI High AI 2025-12-01
CVE-2025-13792 Qualitor getResumo.php eval code injection — Qualitor 7.3 High 2025-11-30
CVE-2025-13786 taosir WTCMS index.php fetch code injection — WTCMS 7.3 High 2025-11-30
CVE-2025-66224 OrangeHRM is Vulnerable to Code Execution Through Arbitrary File Write from Sendmail Parameter Injection — orangehrm 8.1 - 2025-11-29
CVE-2025-59302 Apache CloudStack: Potential remote code execution on Javascript engine defined rules — Apache CloudStack 7.2 - 2025-11-27
CVE-2025-62593 Ray is vulnerable to RCE via Safari & Firefox Browsers through DNS Rebinding Attack — ray 9.4 Critical 2025-11-26
CVE-2025-33204 NVIDIA Nemo Framework 代码注入漏洞 — NeMo Framework 7.8 High 2025-11-25
CVE-2025-6389 Sneeit Framework <= 8.3 - Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution in sneeit_articles_pagination_callback — Sneeit Framework 9.8 Critical 2025-11-25
CVE-2025-65108 md-to-pdf is vulnerable to arbitrary JavaScript code execution when parsing front matter — md-to-pdf 10.0 Critical 2025-11-21
CVE-2025-65099 Claude Code vulnerable to command execution prior to startup trust dialog — claude-code 8.8AI High AI 2025-11-19
CVE-2025-65026 esm.sh CDN service has JS Template Literal Injection in CSS-to-JavaScript — esm.sh 6.1 Medium 2025-11-19
CVE-2025-10703 Progress多款产品 代码注入漏洞 — DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Amazon Redshift 9.8AI Critical AI 2025-11-19
CVE-2025-10702 Progress多款产品 代码注入漏洞 — DataDirect Connect for JDBC for Amazon Redshift 9.8AI Critical AI 2025-11-19

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) represent 1752 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.