Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1743

1743 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-94 represents a critical code injection weakness where software constructs executable code using untrusted input without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts or commands into user-supplied fields, such as web forms or API parameters, which the application then executes directly. This allows adversaries to bypass security controls, steal sensitive data, or gain unauthorized administrative access to the underlying system. To prevent such exploits, developers must rigorously validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected characters are processed. Implementing strict allow-listing strategies, utilizing parameterized queries for database interactions, and avoiding dynamic code execution functions like eval() are essential defensive measures. By treating all user input as potentially hostile and applying robust encoding techniques, organizations can effectively neutralize injection vectors and maintain application integrity.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Common Consequences (4)
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
In some cases, injectable code controls authentication; this may lead to a remote vulnerability.
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Injected code can access resources that the attacker is directly prevented from accessing.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
When a product allows a user's input to contain code syntax, it might be possible for an attacker to craft the code in such a way that it will alter the intended control flow of the product. As a result, code injection can often result in the execution of arbitrary code. Code injection attacks can…
Non-Repudiation Hide Activities
Often the actions performed by injected control code are unlogged.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Architecture and Design Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating s…
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Testing Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Operation Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Examples (2)
This example attempts to write user messages to a message file and allow users to view them.
$MessageFile = "messages.out"; if ($_GET["action"] == "NewMessage") { $name = $_GET["name"]; $message = $_GET["message"]; $handle = fopen($MessageFile, "a+"); fwrite($handle, "<b>$name</b> says '$message'<hr>\n"); fclose($handle); echo "Message Saved!<p>\n"; } else if ($_GET["action"] == "ViewMessages") { include($MessageFile); }
Bad · PHP
name=h4x0r message=%3C?php%20system(%22/bin/ls%20-l%22);?%3E
Attack
edit-config.pl: This CGI script is used to modify settings in a configuration file.
use CGI qw(:standard); sub config_file_add_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to add a field/key to a file goes here } sub config_file_set_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to set key to a particular file goes here } sub config_file_delete_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to delete key from a particular file goes here } sub handleConfigAction { my ($fname, $action) = @_; my $key = param('key'); my $val = param('val'); # this is super-efficient code, especially if you have to invoke # any one of dozens of different functions! my $code = "config_file_$action_key(\$fnam
Bad · Perl
add_key(",","); system("/bin/ls");
Attack
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-22390 WordPress Builderall Builder for WordPress plugin <= 3.0.1 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — Builderall Builder for WordPress 9.9 Critical 2026-03-05
CVE-2026-28783 Craft has a Twig Function Blocklist Bypass — cms 7.2AI High AI 2026-03-04
CVE-2025-59059 Apache Ranger: Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in NashornScriptEngineCreator — Apache Ranger 9.8AI Critical AI 2026-03-03
CVE-2026-21853 AFFiNE: One-click Remote Code Execution through Custom URL Handling — AFFiNE 8.8 High 2026-03-02
CVE-2026-3132 Master Addons for Elementor Premium <= 2.1.3 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Remote Code Execution via render_preview — Master Addons for Elementor Premium 8.8 High 2026-03-02
CVE-2026-3409 eosphoros-ai db-gpt Flow Import Endpoint import importlib.machinery.SourceFileLoader.exec_module code injection — db-gpt 7.3 High 2026-03-02
CVE-2026-3395 MaxSite CMS MarkItUp Preview AJAX Endpoint preview-ajax.php eval code injection — CMS 7.3 High 2026-03-01
CVE-2026-28425 Statamic vulnerable to remote code execution via Antlers-enabled control panel inputs — cms 8.0 High 2026-02-27
CVE-2026-21658 Johnson Controls -Frick Quantum HD- Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution — Frick Controls Quantum HD 9.8 - 2026-02-27
CVE-2026-21657 Johnson Controls -Frick Quantum HD- Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution — Frick Controls Quantum HD 6.8 - 2026-02-27
CVE-2026-21656 Johnson Controls -Frick Quantum HD- Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution — Frick Controls Quantum HD 6.8 - 2026-02-27
CVE-2026-27966 Langflow has Remote Code Execution in CSV Agent — langflow 9.8 Critical 2026-02-26
CVE-2026-27952 Agenta has Python Sandbox Escape, Leading to Remote Code Execution (RCE) — agenta-api 8.8 High 2026-02-26
CVE-2026-27498 n8n has Arbitrary Command Execution via File Write and Git Operations — n8n 8.8AI High AI 2026-02-25
CVE-2026-27577 n8n: Expression Sandbox Escape Leads to RCE — n8n 9.4 Critical 2026-02-25
CVE-2026-27497 n8n has Potential Remote Code Execution via Merge Node — n8n 8.8AI High AI 2026-02-25
CVE-2026-27495 n8n has a Sandbox Escape in its JavaScript Task Runner — n8n 8.5AI High AI 2026-02-25
CVE-2026-27493 n8n has Unauthenticated Expression Evaluation via Form Node — n8n 9.8AI Critical AI 2026-02-25
CVE-2026-27701 LiveCodes vulnerable to JavaScript Injection via untrusted PR title in i18n-update-pull workflow — livecodes 6.1AI Medium AI 2026-02-25
CVE-2026-1929 Advanced Woo Labels <= 2.37 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Remote Code Execution via 'callback' Parameter — Advanced Woo Labels – Product Labels & Badges for WooCommerce 8.8 High 2026-02-25
CVE-2026-27597 @enclave-vm/core is vulnerable to Sandbox Escape — enclave 10.0 Critical 2026-02-25
CVE-2026-27744 SPIP tickets < 4.3.3 Unauthenticated RCE — tickets 9.8 Critical 2026-02-25
CVE-2026-27745 SPIP interface_traduction_objets < 2.2.2 Authenticated RCE — interface_traduction_objets 8.8 High 2026-02-25
CVE-2024-56373 Apache Airflow: SSTI to Code Execution in Airflow through Shared DB Information — Apache Airflow 8.0AI High AI 2026-02-24
CVE-2026-25797 ImageMagick vulnerable to Code injection via PostScript header in ps coders — ImageMagick 5.7 Medium 2026-02-24
CVE-2025-9120 RCE vulnerability has been discovered in OpenText™ Carbonite Safe Server Backup. — Carbonite Safe Server Backup 9.8AI Critical AI 2026-02-24
CVE-2026-27574 OneUptime: node:vm sandbox escape in probe allows any project member to achieve RCE — oneuptime 10.0 Critical 2026-02-21
CVE-2026-26045 Moodle: moodle: improper validation in file restore functionality leading to remote code execution 7.2 High 2026-02-21
CVE-2025-67979 WordPress WPForms Google Sheet Connector plugin <= 4.0.1 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — WPForms Google Sheet Connector 9.9 Critical 2026-02-20
CVE-2025-52744 WordPress Inpersttion For Theme plugin <= 1.0 - Arbitrary Code Execution vulnerability — Inpersttion For Theme 7.7 High 2026-02-20

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) represent 1743 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.